Manish Garg v. Smt Malini Garg
Case brief
What is this about?
15/2017 on’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.H Mr.…
15/2017 on’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.H Mr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C24 No. 15/2017
Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.
Mr. K.R. Gazi, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. P.C. Petshali, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the respondent.
Learned Counsel for the applicant made endorsement on the order sheet to the effect that this transfer petition has now become infructuous because the Presiding Office, against whom the allegations have been made seeking transfer of matrimonial case pending between the parties, has been transferred from the Family Court, Dehradun.
So, this petition has rendered infructuous. It is dismissed as such.
(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 7.7.2017
Prabodh
Applicant
Respondent
Servesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court