Binod Kumar Chauhan v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2013 U. C. Dhyani, J. Mr. Piyush Garg…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No. 537 of 2013
U. C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate alongwith Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. V.S. Pal, A.G.A. present for the State.
After arguing the criminal writ petition at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw criminal writ petition with liberty to file application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Criminal writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as above.
(U. C. Dhyani, J.) 20.4.2015
SH
Coram
U. C. Dhyani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPCRL/537/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court