The Court dismissed the criminal writ petition as infructuous upon the filing of the chargesheet. The interim order continues until further chargesheet submission.
Criminal writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.1025 of 2012
Hon’ble U. C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. P. S. Soan, Deputy Advocate General present for the State.
Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate present for the private respondent.
It is stated by learned counsel for the State that the chargesheet has been filed against the petitioners.
In view of the aforesaid statement of learned State counsel, the criminal writ petition has rendered infructuous and is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 19.10.2014 shall continue to operate till the submission of the chargesheet against the petitioners before the court concerned and no further.
(U. C. Dhyani, J.)
Dated 20.04.2015
Rawat
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal writ petition remains maintainable after the filing of the chargesheet against the petitioners.
Petitioners
State
Private Respondent
U. C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
