This writ petition concerned a pending mutation application. The Court disposed of the petition by directing the first Respondent to decide the application within one month.
Direction to Respondent No.1 to decide the petitioner's mutation application within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMS No.448 of 2014
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. Gopal K. Verma, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. Devesh Bishoni, Advocate present for the respondent No.1.
The only prayer of the petitioner is that his mutation application is pending since the year 2010 before respondent No.1.
Since this is an innocuous prayer. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to decide the application of the petitioner for mutation within a period of one month from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.
( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) 04.03.2014
JKJ
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
