The single-bench judgment dismisses the writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's statement that the underlying matter has become without purpose.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMS No.2965 of 2013 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, Advocate holding brief of Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mrs. Neetu Singh, Advocate present for the respondent Nos. 2,3, 5 & 6.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at bar that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) 04.03.2014
JKJ
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
