Smt. Vidhyawati and Others v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2014 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J. Mr.…
of 2014 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J. Mr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.161 of 2014 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J.
Mr. K.S.Verma, Advocate present for the writ petitioners.
Mr. P. S. Soun, learned Deputy Advocate General, present for the State. Mr. V. P. Bahuguna, Advocate, present for the private respondent. Learned counsel representing the State submitted that Charge Sheet has been filed against the petitioners.
In view of the above development, the criminal writ petition has rendered infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 25.02.2014 will continue to operate till the submission of the Charge Sheet before the Court concerned and no further.
(U.C.Dhyani, J.) 21.05.2014
Kaushal
Writ Petitioners
State
U.C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court