This order condones the delay and permits the withdrawal of a recall application filed by the applicant, granting liberty to approach the appropriate forum for the remedy.
Delay condoned and recall application withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C-482 Petition No. 30 of 2014 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J.
Ms. Neetu Singh, Advocate, present for the applicant.
Mr. S.S.Adhikari, Brief Holder, present for the State.
Delay Condonation Application (CRMA No. 654 of 2014) in filing the recall application is not seriously objected by the learned counsel for the State. The same is allowed and the delay in filing the Recall Application is hereby condoned.
Recall application (being MCRC No. 73 of 2014) is permitted to be withdrawn with to liberty pursue appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.
(U.C.Dhyani, J.) 21.05.2014
Kaushal
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Applicant
The State
U.C. Dhyanji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
