The application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the total absence of the applicants despite a revised call. Any interim order was vacated. This is a procedural order devoid of substantive legal principles or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C482-1148 OF 2013
U. C. Dhyani, J.
None appears for the applicants even in the revised call.
Mr. V. S. Pal, AGA is present for the State.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(U. C. Dhyani, J.)
Dated 06.05.2014
Rawat
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State
Unnamed Applicants
U. C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
