The bail application by the applicant was allowed to be withdrawn accordingly, resulting in the dismissal of the application. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
B.A.3 no. 36 of 2013
U.C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. Bhuwanesh Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.S. Pal, AGA with Mrs. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for the respondent State.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that permission be granted to him to withdraw the bail application.
The third bail application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(U.C. Dhyani, J.) 05.05.2014
HN
U.C. Dhyani
The State
U.C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
