Moh. Haneef v. State Of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment is a one-line order wherein the bail application stand withdrawn and dismissed.
This judgment is a one-line order wherein the bail application stand withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA1 No. 144 of 2014 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J.
Mr. Ramji Srivastava and Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocates, present for the applicant.
Mr. V.S.Pal, learned AGA, present for the State.
Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate, present for the complainant. After arguing the case at some length, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the bail application. The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(U.C.Dhyani, J.) 11.03.2014
Kaushal
Applicant
State
U.C.Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court