The petitionwas dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the applicants in the revised call before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C-482 Petition No. 776 of 2011 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J.
None appears for the applicants, even in the revised call. It is now 4:15 p.m. Mr. P.S.Soun, learned Deputy Advocate General, present for the State. Mr. Swapnil Bisht, Advocate, present for the private respondent. The C-482 Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(U.C.Dhyani, J.) 11.03.2014
Kaushal
Unknown Applicants
State
Private Respondent
U.C.Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
