Dismissed
Amit Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand and Anr.
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/1693/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2012 Hon’ble Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2012 Hon’ble Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMS No.1693 of 2012 Hon’ble Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.
Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Addl. C.S.C. present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Affidavit of rejoinder is not required in the matter of this nature.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I dispose of the writ petition directing respondent No.1 i.e. Secretary, Urban Development Uttarakhand, Dehradun to treat copy of the writ petition as representation and consider the issues raised by the petitioner in the writ petition upon giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and pass speaking order.
The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
Let a copy of the writ petition and certified copy of this order be forwarded to the above Officer.
(K.J. Sengupta, J.) 06.03.2013
JKJ
Petitioner
Secretary, Urban Development Uttarakhand
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court