Vinay Kumar Sharma v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
None
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No. 83 of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.
Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.O. Bhakuni, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the private respondent. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner.
In view of the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Permitted to be withdrawn.
(Alok Singh, J.) 26.09.2013
SKS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPCRL/83/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court