Wajid v. State O Futtarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants regular bail to applicant Wajid in a criminal case triable by a Magistrate, requiring a personal bond and two sureties.
What did the court decide?
Regular bail allowed on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of the like amount.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital the 17th Day of May, 2013 1st Bail Application No. 416 of 2013
Order on the Bail Application:
CRIMINAL SIDE
Wajid …………..Applicant.
Versus State of Uttarakhand .………….Respondent.
Present: Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent.
Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. (Oral)
This is a bail application seeking regular bail in Case Crime No. 26 of 2013 under Sections 394, 120-B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar.
Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, Advocate appearing for the applicant, submits that applicant has been implicated in the present case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Mallu @ Parvej; confessional statement of the co-accused are not admissible against the present applicant; further contends that all offences are triable by learned Magistrate and after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Wajid
- respondent
State of Uttarakhand
Coram
Alok Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BA1/416/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court