Abdul Rahim v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
In this brief bail application, the High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the release of Abdul Rahim, an accidental injury offender with no criminal history, on furnishing personal bond and two sureties.
What did the court decide?
Bail allowed upon executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital: the 3rd day of December, 2012 First Bail Application No. 1544 of 2012
Criminal Side Abdul Rahim S/o Haji Hanif R/o Shankarpur Hukumatpur P.S. Sahaspur District Dehradun
…….Applicant (In Jail)
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
…..Opposite Party
Arising out of Case Crime No. 210 of 2012 Under Section: 308 of I.P.C. Police Station: Sahaspur District: Dehradun
Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.
Mrs. Prabha Naithani, Advocate, present for the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves bail in a case of accidental injury under Section 308 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Abdul Rahim
Coram
Prafulla C. Pant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BA1/1544/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court