This is an order allowing a bail application by a woman applicant falsely implicated in a case under Section 304 IPC and dowry laws, where her in-laws had already been released and no specific role was assigned to her in the FIR.
Release on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital: the 21st day of November, 2012 1st Bail Application No.1472 of 2012
Order on the Bail Application:
CRIMINAL SIDE
Smt. Mamta W/o Vinod Singh Bohra, D/o Ratendra @ Ratan Singh Sawant, R/o Behind Maida Mil Amau, P.S. Khatima, District U.S. Nagar.
………Applicant (in Jail)
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
…… Opposite Party
Arising out of F.I.R. No. 182 of 2012, Under Section 304B of I.P.C., and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition act, 1961, Police Station Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar.
Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate, present for the applicant.
Mr. V.S. Pal, A.G.A., present for the State.
Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.
Heard.
2
offence punishable under Section 304B of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought her release on bail.
3
sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Khatima.
(Prafulla C. Pant, J.)
21.11.2012 JM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves bail in a case under Section 304 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Mamta W/o Vinod Singh Bohra, D/o Ratendra @ Ratan Singh Sawant
Prafulla C. Pant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
