This judgment grants bail to applicant Imamuddin in a bail application arising from FIR No. 554 of 2011 regarding theft. The High Court allowed the bail application on the ground that the applicant, already in jail for a related offence, deserves release.
Release on bail on execution of personal bond and furnishing two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital: the 1st day of December, 2012 First Bail Application No. 1174 of 2012
Criminal Side Imamuddin S/o Shafik Ahmad R/o Village Sarwarkhera P.S. Kunda District Udham Singh Nagar
…….Applicant (In Jail)
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
…..Opposite Party
Arising out of F.I.R No. 554 of 2011 Under Sections: 379 of I.P.C Police Station: Kashipur District: Udham Singh Nagar
Mr. Abhimanyu Maan, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. B.S.Negi, Advocate, present for the applicant.
Mr. K.S.Rangad, Brief Holder, present for the State.
Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.
Heard.
2
3
sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur.
(Prafulla C. Pant, J.)
Dt.01.12.2012 Nahid
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves bail in a case relating to theft under Section 379 of IPC.
Whether the applicant should be held guilty based solely on disclosures by co-accused without specific recovery from him.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Imamuddin S/o Shafik Ahmad
Prapulla C. Pant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
