The High Court of Uttaranchal rejected a criminal writ petition filed under section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Act, 1986, finding no grounds for interference.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 967 (M/B) 2003
Subhash Nagare, S/o Sri Rameshwar Singh, R/o Village Lakhanawali, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida …………………. Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & Others ………………… Respondents
Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.P.S. Panwar, Government Advocate for the State.
Coram: Hon. S.H. Kapadia, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J.
Date: 16.10.2003
PC:
Perused the first information report dated 16.09.2003 lodged against the petitioner and other co-accused under section 2/3 of U.P.Gangster and Anti Social Activities(Prevention)Act, 1986. It discloses congnizable offence and the allegations made therein are inherently probable. Hence, no interference is called for.
The petition is rejected.
(Irshad Hussain, J.) (S.H. Kapadia, C.J.)
AK:
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal writ petition seeking quashing of proceedings under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Act should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subhash Nagare
State of Uttaranchal
S.H. Kapadia
Irshad Hussain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
