The court disposed of Writ Petition (PIL) No.05/2016 as infructuous due to subsequent developments. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C)(PIL) NO.05/2016
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the petitioner : Mr. A.C. Bhowmik, Sr. Advocate, Mr. D.C. Roy, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Biswanath Majumder, CGC, Mr. T.D. Majumder, G.A., Mr. B.N. Majumder, Advocate.
20.06.2017.
Heard Mr. A.C. Bhowmik, the learned Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. D.C. Roy, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Biswanath Majumder, the learned CGC, Mr. T.D. Majumder, the learned Govt. Advocate and Mr. B.N. Majumder, the learned counsel for the respondent No.10.
It is stated by learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner that this petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent development.
Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of being infructuous.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
WP(C)(PIL) NO.05/2016
Page 1 of 1
Petitioner
Respondent No.10
T. Vaiphei
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
