Court on Own Motion v. the State of Tripura and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed a PIL regarding the service of warrants on accused. It noted considerable improvement in the situation and decided no further directions were required barring cases where accused are untraceable.
What did the court decide?
Public Interest petition closed and pending application(s) disposed of.
What the court decided
Page - 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
WP(C)(PIL) No.18/2015
Court on own motion.
………….. Petitioner(s).
Vs.
State of Tripura
………….. Respondent(s).
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Somik Deb, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. A K Bhowmik, Advocate General, Mr. K De, Addl. Govt. Advocate.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S TALAPATRA
O_R_D_E_R
14.02.2020
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Court on own motion
- respondent
State of Tripura
Coram
Akil Kureshi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Tripura HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)(PIL)/18/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court