The Chief Justice disposed of two interim applications filed in connection with two pending writ petitions. The judgment contains no substantive reasoning.
The interim applications are disposed of based on an order passed in the connected matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. NO.01/2017(270/2017) IN WP(C)(CAT) NO.01/2017 along with I.A. NO.01/2017(394/2017) IN WP(C)(CAT) NO.02/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the applicants : Mr. Bidyut Majumder, CGC. For the respondents : Mr. S.M. Chakraborty, Sr. Advocate, Mr. C.S. Sinha, Advocate, Ms. B. Chakraborty, Advocate.
22.11.2017.
In view of the order passed today in WP(C)(CAT) No.01 of 2017 & other connected matter, these applications stand disposed of.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
I.A. NO.01/2017(270/2017) IN WP(C)(CAT) NO.01/2017 a/w I.A. NO.01/2017(394/2017) IN WP(C)(CAT) NO.02/2017
Page 1 of 1
T. VAIPHEI
S. TALAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
