Single judge allowed an interim application to implead Md. Nur Islam as respondent No.4 in a connected transfer petition for lack of necessary party status, citing no representation from the other side.
The application to implead Md. Nur Islam as respondent no.4 was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. NO.01/2017 IN TRP(CRL) NO.01/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI
Present:
For the applicant : Mr. S. Mahajan, Advocate. For the respondents : None.
08.09.2017.
Heard Mr. S. Mahajan, the learned counsel for the applicant.
No representation from the respondents.
The application is for impleading one Md. Nur Islam as the respondent No.4 in the connected transfer petition.
As the respondent No.4 is a necessary party, the application is allowed.
Md. Nur Islam is accordingly made respondent No.4 in
the connected transfer petition.
The application stands disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
I.A. NO.01/2017 IN TRP(CRL) NO.01/2017
Page 1 of 1
S. Mahajan (as counsel for the applicant)
Md. Nur Islam
T. Vaiphei
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a criminal case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
