Petitioner requested withdrawal of CRP 53 of 2016 with liberty to approach competent court, as there was a substantive appellate provision available. Court allowed prayer and dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty reserved.
Prayer to withdraw petition with liberty to approach competent court is allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Noting by Officer or Advocate |
Serial No. |
Date | Office notes, reports, orders or proceedings With signature |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRP 53 of 2016 B E F O R E THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.TALAPATRA |
|||
22.09.2017 Mr. DR Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that inadvertently the petitioner has approached this court though there is a substantive appellate provision to challenge the impugned order. Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty reserved to approach the appropriate court. Such prayer stands allowed. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the competent court. Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appears for the respondents No. 1 and 2. JUDGE |
| Saikat |
|---|
Petitioner
Respondents No. 1 and 2
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
