Shefali Begam v. the State of Tripura and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal petition was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the Court disposed of the matter as not pressed.
The criminal petition was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the Court disposed of the matter as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.PETN. NO.28/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI
Present: For the petitioner : Ms. K. Roy, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. S. Sarkar, P.P. 31.07.2017.
Ms. K. Roy, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she does not wish to press this criminal petition. In view of this, the criminal petition stands disposed of as not pressed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
CRL.PETN. NO.28/2017
Page 1 of 1
Petitioner
Respondent
T. Vaipei
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court