The learned Public Prosecutor did not press the appeal to enhance the sentence as no leave is required. The court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL LP NO.06 of 2017 IN CRL A NO.11 of 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the petitioner : Mr. S. Sarkar, Public Prosecutor.
For the respondent : Mr. A. Acharjee, Advocate.
20.09.2017.
Heard Mr. S. Sarkar, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and also heard Mr. A. Acharjee, the learned counsel for the respondent.
As no leave is required for filing appeal to enhance the sentence, the learned Public Prosecutor does not wish to press this petition, which is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Dipesh
CRL LP NO.06 of 2017 IN CRL A NO.11 of 2017 Page 1 of 1
State
Respondent
T. Vaiphei
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
