Disposed
Rima Das Represented by Her Father Sri Bijoy Das v. State Of Tripura and Anr.
Tripura HCCrl.A./19/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN CRL.A. NO.19/2017 Page 1 of 1 I.A.…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN CRL.A. NO.19/2017 Page 1 of 1 I.A.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. NO.01/2017 IN CRL.A. NO.19/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the applicant : Mr. K. Datta, Advocate. For the respondent No.1 : Mr. S. Sarkar, P.P. For the respondent No.2 : Mr. N. Das, Advocate, Mr. D.C. Roy, Advocate.
28.11.2017.
On the prayer of Mr. K. Datta, the learned counsel for the applicant, which is not opposed by Mr. S. Sarkar, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State-respondent and Mr. N. Das, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, the applicant is allowed to withdraw this application.
The application for condonation of delay is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
I.A. NO.01/2017 IN CRL.A. NO.19/2017
Page 1 of 1
Applicant
State
Respondent No.2
T. Vaiphei
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court