Disposed
The State of Tripura v. Dipankar Sarkar @ Titu
Tripura HCCrl.A./11/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2017 Page 1 of 1 CRL A NO.11 of 2017…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2017 Page 1 of 1 CRL A NO.11 of 2017…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL A NO.11 of 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the petitioner : Mr. S. Sarkar, Public Prosecutor.
For the respondent : Mr. A. Acharjee, Advocate.
20.09.2017.
Heard Mr. S. Sarkar, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and also heard Mr. A. Acharjee, the learned counsel for the respondent.
As there are many defects in the memo of appeal as pointed out by Mr. A. Acharjee, the learned counsel for the respondent, we direct the appellant to file a fresh memo of appeal.
In view of our direction, this appeal is also disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Dipesh
CRL A NO.11 of 2017 Page 1 of 1
State
Respondent
T. Vaiphei
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court