Smt Dhadi Chandrakala Vs The State of Telangana

¶1

[^32e9 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 39858 OF 202s

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt Dhadi Chandrakala Wo Sri. Dhadi Srinivas Reddy, aged about 37^years, Occupation Household, Rl/o House No. 7-1-413l1 1/2, Srinivasa^{Colony East,} Ameerpet, Hyderabad -500016, Telangana State.

¶9

Dandem Rama Krishna Reddy S/o. Sathi Reddy, aged about^{43 years,} Occupation Employee, R/o^prestige Tranquil, 2276 Flat,^{Tower 2, Golden Mile} Road, Kokapet, Hyderabad, Kokapet, PO: Kokapet,^{DIST: RangaReddy,} Telangana, 50007.

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary^Revenue Department, at Secretariat Hyderabad.

¶13

¶14

District Collector, Sangareddy District

¶15

J. Revenue Divisional Officer, Jinnaram Mandal, at Sangareddy District

¶16

¶17

The Mandal Revenue officer, Sangareddy District

¶18

The Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal, at Sangareddy District.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^{praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High Court may be} pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more^particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the^{inaction of the Respondents,in not} taking any action on the Petitioners Applications^{bearing Transaction lD} 19T351700000805 dated 06-10-2025 for Ac.3.00 Gts and^{Transaction lD} '19T351700000807 dated 06-10-2025 for Ac.2.00 Gts, both situated at

¶21

Sy.No.B29l1, rtf Oo,a Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sangareddy District, made on Bhubharathi portar for removar of their Iand from the prohibition rist under Section 22A of the Regristration Act, as iregar, arbitrary, unconstitutionar, and contrary to the Government Orders governing Ex-servicemen assigned lands and consequen y direct the Respondents, particularly the Respondents 2 and 5 herein to forthw th remove the petitioners, lands in Sy. No.829/., (sub_divided as 829//111 and 829//112) of oo,a Virage, Jinnaram Mandar, sangareddy District, from the prohibition properties List maintain e d I rrrqrrrrarn o under section 22-A of lhe Registration Act, 1g0g.

¶22

lANO:1OF 202s

¶23

petition unr,er Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the ResponrJents to entertain the documents presented by the petitioners herein for registration in relation to their land in Sy. No. g29l1 (sub_divided as 829',111 and 829/t1t2) of oora Virage, Jinnaram Mandal, sangareddy District, without reference t. t6" .",0 incruding in prohibition rist under section - ' -!' 22A^r ot v' , the Registration Act, 190g, pending disposal of the main Writ petition.

¶24

Counset for the petitioners: M/s. A. SATYASIRI Counsel for the Res,oondents: SRI L. RAVINDER,

¶25

AGP FOR REVENUE

¶26

The Court made the foltowing: ORDER

¶27

t

¶28

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶30

WRIT PETITION No.39858 of 2o25

¶31

DATE OF ORDER: O5.OL.2O26

¶32

ITISIIIIIEDI\IE

¶33

Smt Dhadi Chandrakala and another

¶34

Petitioners

¶35

AND

¶36

The State of Telang€u1a Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r, Revenue Department and 4 others.

¶37

... Respondents

¶38

: ORDER:

¶39

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

¶40

"...to issue an appropriate Writ Order or^Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not taking any action on the Petitioners applications bearing Transaction ID 19T351700000805 dated 06.1O.2025 for Ac.3.0O^Gts and Transaction ID 19T351700000807^dated 06.10.2025 for Ac.2.00 Gts, both situated at^Sy. No.829/ 1 of Ootla Village, Jinnaram^Mandal, Sangareddy District made on Bhubharathi^portal for removal of their land from the prohibition list under Section 22A of the Registration Act as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to^the Government Orders governing Ex-Servicemen assigned lands and consequently direct the Respondents particularly the Respondent Nos.2 and 5 herein to forthwith remove the Petitioners lands in and Sy.No.829lL, subdivided as 8291 ll / |

¶41

2

¶42

529//l/2 of^{Ootla Village,JinnaramMandal,} Sangareddy District^{from the ProhibitionProperties} list maintained under^Section 22A of^the Re gistration Act^1908..."

¶43

Heard Ms. A.Satyasiri,^{learned counsel} for the^petitioners, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. I to 5. Pemsed the record.

¶44

When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel .:or the petitioners seek a direction to respondents to examine and pass orders on their online applications bearing transaction ID Nos. 19T351700000805, dated 06.10.2025 and 19T351700000807, dated O6.1O.2O25 for removal of their land from the orohibitory list, which are pending before respondents.

¶45

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue seeks short span of time to dispose of the online applications dated 06.10.20i15 submitted by the petitioners.

¶46

Hav:.ng regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon considering the material available on record, this Court- is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing responderLts to consider the online applications bearing transaction ID Nos. 19T351700000805, dated 06.10.2025 and

¶47

3

¶48

19T35 1700ooo⁸⁰⁷ ,^{dated 06.10 .2025 and after thorough} enquiry,^{pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law,} by issuing^{necessarynotices to the petitioners and all interested} parties and^{afford them sufficientopportunity of hearing,as} expeditiously^{as possible, preferably, within a period of ninety} (g0) working^{days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.}

¶49