Golla Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana

1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, lrrigation & CAD Project Winq-LAR & R Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶18

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶19

The Commissioner of Land Revenue, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶20

The District Collector, Wanaparthy, Wanaparthy District.

¶21

The Executive Engineer,, RL Executive Division, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District

¶22

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A.RLISP-ll, Pebbai Present Wanaparthy, Wanaparthy District.

¶23

...RESPONDENTS

¶24

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not determining the market value of petitioner land in Sy.No. 201, to an extent of

¶25

Ac.0-30 Gts, situated at Jurala Village, Atmakur Mandal as^{per the orderand} Decree passed in OP.No. 52 oI 2012, OP.No. 61 of 2011^{and OP.No. 64 of 2011,} dated 03-04-2019 and subsequently application^{made by the petitioner on 28-06-} 2019 Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, consequently to direct^the respondents to re-determine the compensation by considering the^petitioners application dated 28-06-2019 filed under Section 28-A of LA Act, to^pay the market value, with all the statutory benefits, in accordance with the market value fixed by Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal in OP.No. 52 o'f 2012, OP.No. 6'1 of 201 1 and OP.No. 64 o'f 2O11. dated 03-04-2019.

¶26

lA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the application dated. 28-06-2019 made by the pelitioners Under Section 2B-A of Land Acquisition Act on the basis of the Order and Decree passed in OP.No. 52 of 2012, OP.No. 61 of 2011 and OP.No. 64 of 201 1 , dated 03-04-2019 by the Learned Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal, pending disposal of the main Writ petition.

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PINGALI LAKSHMI

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 5: SRI DHARAVATH RAVI, AGP FOR IRRIGATION

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: AGP FOR FINANCE

¶31

Counsel for the Respondent No.3,4 & 6: SRI SOMU SRINIVAS REDDY, AGP FOR LAND ACQUISITION

¶32

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

IN THE HICH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶34

THE HONOURABLE SRIIUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRI'I PETITION No.388 of 2026 DATE OF ORDER:07.01.2026

¶35

Between:

¶36

Sri. Golla Ramulu and four others.

¶37

... Petitioners

¶38

AND

¶39

State of Telangana, Irrigation and CAD Project Wing-LAR and R, Hyderabad and five others.

¶40

... Respondents

¶41

ORDER:

¶42

I-Ieard learneci counsel for the petitioncrs ancl Sri.Dl-raravath Ravi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 5, learnccl Assistant Covernment Plcader for Finance appearing for respondent No.2 and Sri.Sornu Srinivas Reddy, learned Assistant Govcrnment Pleader for i,ar.rd acquisition appearing for respondent Nos.3, 4 and 6. With the consent of the parties, the'writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the aclmission stage itself

¶43

This writ petition is filecl seeking follon ing prayer:

¶44

"to declare tlr nction of tlu respondents ifi not determining the mnrket utthLe of yetitioner lond in 5y.No.201, to an extent of^Ar.0-.30 Gts, sittLated at lurala Village, Atnakur lvlnndal, as per the order nnd Decree pnssed in OP No.52 of 20 12, OP No.61 of 2011 and OP No.64 of 2011, dnted 03.04.2019 and subsequently applicntion made by tfu. petitioner on 28.06.2079 Unrler Section 28-A of Lnnd AcquisiLion Act, consequently lo rlirec! the respondents to redetermine tlrc gtmpensotion by considering tlrc petitioru:rs

¶45

.-

¶46

l

¶47

applicatiott rlated 28.06.2019 filed under Section 28-A of LA Act to paV the nnrket ttnlue, uith all the stntutory benefits in accordnnce uith the nnrket ualut fixed by Hon'ble Senior Ciail ludge, Gadtoal in OP No.52 of 2012, OP No.61 ol 2011 antl OP No.64 of 2011, dnted 03.04.20-19."

¶48

foclav rthcn thc mattcr has bcen takcn up for hearing, learned counsel for the pctitioncrs submits that in sir-nilar circurnstance this Court in W.P.No.9607 of 2025 dated ?8.03.2025, passccl the following order:-

¶49

"8. In t'iett of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioncr, this rurit petition is disposed of tlirecting the rcspotulcnt authoritv to disposc the petitioner's applicntion dnted 27.03.2010 made under Section 28-A ol lhe L.A.Act nnd pass nppropriate orders strictly in nccordnnct ruilh lau, os expeditiously as possible, pre.ferably roithin a period o.f truo (02) nrcrtlts fronr tlrc date of receipt of copy of this order and comntunicate the same to the petitioner."

¶50

I-c.rrned r:ounscl for tl"re petitioners further pray this Court to pass sirnilar orders as passed in W.P.No.9607 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025.

¶51

Lcarnecl 1\ssistant Governmcnt Pleader appearing for rcsponderrts dicl not clispu tc. the same

¶52

Recordinl3 the submission made by lcarnecl counscl appcaring on either sicle and in ternrs of orcier passed bv this Court in W.P.No.9607 oi 2025 dateci 28.03.2025, this rvrit petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consiclcr thc petitioners' application dateci 28.06.2019 madc under Section 28-A of thc L.A. Act and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordancc with law, as cxpeditiously as possiblc, preferably within a period of two (02) lnonths

¶53

=

¶54

from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners.

¶55