The High Court disposed of the writ petition regarding inaction on a representation, directing the Tahsildar to pass appropriate orders on the representation expeditiously, preferably within six weeks.
Direction to Tahsildar to pass orders on representation within six weeks
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3301 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 2401s OF 2021
Between:
Dharnamoni Raju, S/o. Pochaiah, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/ o.939/1, Dandumailaram Village, lbrahimpatnam, R.R.Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I n-dia_pfA"y_rrE that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass order or orders one in the nature of Writ of N/andamus declaring the in action of Respondent No.2 for not disposing the Representation made by the petitioner dated.O1lO7l2O21 and that Respondent no.4 may file application for succession in her name including uploading in Dharani Portal, and that if any such application is filed by Respondent No.4 in respect of land in Sy.No.129, admeasuring Ac.1'1-19 guntas, situated at. Dandumailaram Village, lbrahimpatnam [Vlandal, R.R. Dist., Notices may be ordered to thispetitioner and treat this application as objection petition. ln view ofpendency of Civil Suit for Declaration of Title, Recovery of Possession and Consequential lnjunction in 0.S No. 53 of 2021on the File of the Honble Principle Junior Civil Judge, R.R District. and. to declare the action of the respondent is totallyillegal, againstlaw, ultra-
virus and viola':ions of principles of Natural Justice and also the the provisions of the Telangana Rights in land and Pattedar pass book Act,2020 and violation of Article 300-A oi the Constitution of lndia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition rlnderSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil:d in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 and 3 to consider the Representation Dated. 01lO7t2O21 filel by the petitioner as objection petition with respect to the land in Sy.No .129, aclmeasuring Ac.11-19 guntas, situated at. Dandumailaram Village, lbrahimpatnam [t/andal, R.R. Dist., pending disposal of the main writ petition.
counser for the Petitioner ' ?$:3[i?t,|#1o'.ltr,,
'AGAR
Counsel for thr: Respondents No.1to3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents No.4 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
/.,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
I]IT PETITION No.24O15 OF 2O2l
Date:LL.O2.2o.26
Between:
Dharnamoni Raju
| AND | Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| TheStateofTelangana, representedbyPrincipal |
||
Secretary, Revenue |
||
Department, at |
||
Secretariat,Hyderabad |
||
and three others. |
..Respondents
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.2 in not disposing of the representation dated ol.o7.2o2l submitted by the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is filed.
i I I I : i
3' Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation to respondent No.3 on (tl.OZ.2O2l for redressal of his grievance. However, oo action has been taken by respondent No.3 so far. Therefore, learned counser seeks indurgence of this court and prays this courr: to direct respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner,s reprerrentation dated ai.o7.2021 and,pass appropriate orders within a time frame stipulated by this Court.
4 l.earned Government pleader tairly submits that resporLdent No.3 will pass appropriate orders on the petitioirer's representation dated Ol.OZ.2O2l in accordance with law.
5' Having regard to the above made submissions, without going irrto the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of direc;:ing respondent No.3 to pass appropriate orders on the represerltation dated a1.o7.2021 submitted by the pefitioner, strictly in accordance with ,aw, as expeditiousry as possibre, preferabty within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt o[ a copy of this order.
\
; ii
1
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any,
stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REG
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
riat, Telangana
BSK
GJP
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:11 10212026
TI rl: s
(
() i 6 I'IttE
*
ORDER
WP.No.2,l015 of 2021
-.--rr at l rr. !
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
ks re /= l>-e ,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authorities failed to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding land records?
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Dharnamoni Raju
The State of Telangana
The Collector, Ranga Reddy District
The Tahsildar, lbrahimpatnam Mandal
Dharnamoni tvlalleshwari
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
