Allowed¶22

Lakkakula Yakamma v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Feb 2026WP/18770/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court interim order dated 23-08-2021 by P. Naveen Rao, J.; I.A. No. 1 of 2021 in WP No. 18770 of 2021 under Section 151 CPC; petitioner Lakkakula Yakamma; protection from dispossession without due process of land measuring Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.317 (old)/317C (new), Nellikuduru Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District (erstwhile Warangal District); based on Deputy Inspector of Survey, Thorrur report dated 30.09.2019 evidencing possession; respondents include State of Telangana Revenue Department, District Collector Mahabubabad, RDO Thorrur and Tahsildar Nellikuduru.

What did the court decide?

Interim direction to Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process from Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.317 (old)/317C (new), Nellikuduru village and Mandal, pending disposal of WP.No.18770 of 2021.

Lakkakula Yakamma Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[²⁵⁸⁶ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

:PRESENT:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO./ lA No. 1 OF 2021 "

¶5

¶6

Befween:

¶7

WP NO: 18770 OF 2021 /

¶8

Lakkakula Yakamma, Wo. Late L. Somaiah

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

(Petitioner in WP.No.18770 OF 2021 on the flle of High Court)

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Department of Revenue, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶13

The District Collector, Mahabubabad District (Erstwhile Warangal District).

¶14

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thorrur, Mahabubabad Diskict (Erstwhile Warangal District).

¶15

The Tahsildar, Nellikuduru Mandal, Mahabubabad District (Erstwhile Warangal District).

¶16

... Respondent(s) --(Respondents in-do-)

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s S. LAKSHMI KANTH^."'

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE ,'-

¶19

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 not to dispossess the Petitioner from her lavrful possession and enjoyment of the ldnd admeasuring Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.317lC(new) corresponding to Sy.No.317(01d) situated at Nellikuduru Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District (erstwhile Warangal District) pending disposal of WP.No.'18770 of 2021 , on the file of the High Court. ,.

¶20

The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following. (The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case)..

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Having regard to the report of the Deputy lnspector. of Survey, Thorrur, dated 30.09.2019 evidencing possession of the petitioner, respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process from land to an extent of Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.317 (oldll 317|C (new) of Neilikuduru village and Mandal, Mahabubabad district (erstwhile Warangal district).

¶23

SD/- I. NAGA LAKSi.iirIJ ASSISTANT REG:isrrRAir

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,