Errabelli Raghupathi rao Vs R. Neela

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against the Order dated 06.01 .2026 in l.A.No.2 of 2025 in Writ Petition No.39763 of 2025 on the file of the High Court.

¶10

Between:

¶11

Errabelli Raghupathi rao, S/o Sampath rao, Age: 53 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o- H.no-2-132, Relakunta village,Nallabelly Mandal, Warangal, Telangana.

¶12

Engaladasasu. Ramesh, S/o Mallesh, Age: 50 years, Occ: Business R/o-2-88, Relakunta village, Nallabelly Mandal, Warangal, Telangana, Pin-506349

¶13

, ...APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS/PROPOSED RESPONDENT No.8 & 9

¶14

AND

¶15

R. Neela, W/o. Gopal, Age 42 years, Occ- Housewife, R/o Relakunta (V), Nallabetli (M), Warangat District.

¶16

K. Raju, S/o. K Saraiah, Age 41 years, Occ- Daily wager, R/o Relakunta (V), Nallabelli (tr/), Warangal District.

¶17

P. Yellaswamy, S/o P Yellaiah Age 37 years, Occ- Daily wager, R/o Relakunta (V), Nallabelti (M), Warangal Distriit.

¶18

D. Poshalu, S/o D Sailu, Age 50 years, Occ- Daily wager, R/o Relakunta (V), Nallabelli (M), Warangal District.

¶19

B. Shankar, S/o B Hanumanthu, Aged- 41 years, Occ- Daily wager, Rl/o Relakunta (V), Nallabelli (M), Warangal District

¶20

Jannu Ravi, S/o J Saraiah Age 36 years, Occ- Daily wager, FUo Relakunta (V), Nallabelli (M), Warangal District.

¶21

G. Subhash, S/o Late Ankus Age 36 years, Occ- Daily wager, FUo Relakunta (V), Nallabelli (M), Warangal Disirict.

¶22

B. Poulu, S/o Saraiah Age 48 years, Occ; Daily wager, Wo Relakunta^(V), Nallabelli (M), Warangal District.

¶23

G. Chinna, S/o-p llaiah 4gg.Sl years, Occ- Daily wager, R/o Relakunta^(V), Nallabelli (M)' wara"n'' ?::flLtpoNDENrs/RESpoNDENrs/pErroNERS

¶24

10'The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, panchayat Raj Department, at Secretaribt, HvOJraUdO.''-^'

¶25

11'The Distrir;t Collector, (Panchayat Raj), Warangal Collector office, Warangal.

¶26

12.The DistrirJ^panchayat officer, warangal, District- warangal.

¶27

The Divisirnal panchayat officer, Narsampet, District_ warangal.

¶28

14'The Relakunta Gram Panchaya! lp.p by its Panchayat secretary, Relakunta Viilage, N;ailabelti tMandat, Oist?ici: W;.;ig;t.'^"

¶29

15.The Tahsirdar, Nailabeili Mandar, District: warangar

¶30

16' The [/ancal Revenue lnspector, Nallabelli Mandal, District: Warangat.

¶31

...RESPONDENTS IN W.P./RESPONDENTS IN I.A./RESPONDENTS

¶32

lA NO: 1 OF z0zt0

¶33

Petition underSection 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filecl in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in w.P No.39763 of 2025, until pending finalization of the Writ appeal.

¶34

lA NO: 2 OF 20:16

¶35

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to suspend.the orjer in l.A.no. 2 of 2025 in w.P no. 3g763 of 202s, order dated06.01 -2026, untir pending finarization of the writ appear.

¶36

Counsel for ther Appellant: SRI V. NARESH KUMAR

¶37

counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 9: sRr A. sANTHosH KUMAR

¶38

counsel for ther Respondents No.10 to 13: sMT. sHAzrA PARVEEN,

¶39

GP FOR PANCHAYAi iTAJ

¶40

counsel for ther Respondent No.14: sRr K. PRADEEP REDDY, S.C. FOR GRAMPANCHAYAT

¶41

counsel forth* Respondent Nos.15 & 16: sRr MURAUDHAR REDDY KATRAM, GP FOR REVENUE

¶42

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

¶43

\

¶44

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAI{GAITA AT TIYDERABAI)

¶45

THE HON'BLE THE CIIIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESII KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN

¶46

WRIT APPEAL No. 153 of 2026

¶47

DATED :10.,02.2026

¶48

Between:

¶49

Brrabelli Raghupathi llao and another

¶50

Appellants AND ... Respondents

¶51

Thc State of Telangana, Itep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and fifteen others

¶52

.IUDGMENT:

¶53

Sri V. Naresh Kumar, learned counsel appears for

¶54

appellants.

¶55

Sri A. Santhosh Kumar, learned counsel appears for respondent Nos.l to 9.

¶56

Smt. Shazia Parveen, learned Government Pleader for

¶57

Panchayat Raj appears for respondent Nos.10 to 13.

¶58

Sri K. Pradeep Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for

¶59

] i I I \

¶60

Gram Panchayats appears for respondent No.l4.

¶61

Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned^Government

¶62

Pleader for Revenue appears for respondent^{Nos.15 and 16.}

¶63

2 HCJ (AKrS, J) & GMM, J W.A.No.l53 of 2026

¶64

\ \

¶65

The prayer of the appellants to be impleaded as

¶66

responclent Nos.8 and 9 in writ petition No.39763 of 2025 througLL I.A.No.2 of 2025 has been denied by the learned writ Court^yide order dated 06.01 .2026.

¶67

J'he sheet anchor of the appellants' case is that on their r€preS€;htation, the Mandal Revenue officer conducted an enquiry against respondent Nos. t to 9 in the writ Appeal who being aggrieved thereby have preferred writ petition No.39763 of 2025. The appellants have also preferred a writ Petiticn but the objections pointed out by the Registry have not been c;omplied with. The learned writ court was of the opinion that since the respondent authorities have initiated action on the alleged representation of the appellants, the role of the appellants has come to an end. Therefore, they are not necessary and proper parties.

¶68

4' The role of the appeilants herein wourd at best be the initiation of the process by way of representation relating to any illegality or irregurarity being conducted by the alleged

¶69

HCJ^(AKrS, J) & GMM, J W.A.No.153 of 2O26

¶70

3

¶71

persons. Thereafter, once the matter has been enquired by the official respondents, the fate of the proceedings would be determined as per [aw, of course, after opportunity to the affected parties. Therefore, the approach of the learned writ Court does not suffer from any error. However, we do not wish to make any comment on the independent proceedings being sought to be initiated by the appellants which is at the stage of S.R. objections. The same could be dealt with in accordance with law if the objections are complied with.

¶72

Accordingly, the instant Writ Appeal is dismissed. There

¶73

shall be no order as to costs.

¶74

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

closed

REGISTRAR

//TRUE^COPY/'

OFFICER

To

One^{CC to SRI V' NARESH KUMAR' Advocate}

¶81

One^{CC to SRI A' SANTHOSHKUMAR, Advocate loPucl} 3 Two CCs^{to GP for PanchaYatRaj, High Court for the Staleof Telangana at} Hyderabad tourl

¶82

One^{CC to SRI K'PRADEEP REDDY, S'C' for Gramapanchayat [OPUCf} 5 Two^{CCs to GPfor Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana} at Hyderabad^.tourl

¶83