Writ Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellants with liberty to prefer a fresh appeal for the aggrieved parties. No order as to costs.
Liberty allowed to the aggrieved appellants to prefer a separate appeal; the Writ Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3488 I
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THENINTHDAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYSIX
PRESENT
THEHoNoURABLETHECHIEFJUSTICESRIAPARESHKUMARSINGH AND THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEG.M.MoHIUDDIN
WRIT APPEALNO: 148 OF 2026
Writ Appeal underclause 15 of the Letters PatentAppealPreferred Against the order Dated23-06-2025Passed in w.P.No.9563of 2014 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
2.'The GeneralManager,Hindustan AeronauticsLimited, Hal Township' aatanagar,Hyderabad Division, Hyderabad'
...APPELLANTS
AND
uf$'e1x#lis?i';3,:Hf,"#ti:?r,T,iiil::54:3'%,?lxiSAl:1,'lilh"" Coionv, knin"iigud a, Ti ru malagherry,Secu nd erabad'
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for theAppellants: MS, V UMA DEVI
counsel for theRespondents: sRl G. VIDYA SAGAR, REPRESENTING MS K. UDAYASRI
The CourtDelivered the following: JUDGMENT
ry
IN THE ]FITGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUS CE SRI AP SH KUMAR SINGH
AND
THE H N'BLE SRI JUS TICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN
WRIT APPEAL No.148 of2026
DATED: 09.02.2026
Between:
Hinduptan Aeronautics Limited, Cubbon Road, Corporate Officr,, 1 5 I l, Bangalore, Rep. By its Chaimran and Managing Director & 3 others
... Appellants
AND
N.Sharada
Respondent
JUDG MENT:
Heard Ms. V.Uma Devi, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. G.Vidya Sr1g8r, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. K.Udaya Sri,
learned counsel, appearing for the respondent.
\
2- The writ trppeal is directed by all the four respondents in W.p.No.9563 of - 2014, who are the appellants herein, ) --o------- against the impugned order -'^'r- dated \ 23.06-2025 whe,reby the learned writ Court directed the appellants to issue '. * proceedings for regularisation/absorption within a period of four months from the date of rec:ipt of copy of the order and pay consequential benefits as applicable to the post with arrears, if any, after retirement of the respondent lwrit petitioner.
\ \
2
Miscellaneous applicationspending,if any, shall stand closed
SD/.P. .NAGABHUSI.IAMBA PUTY REG
,/TRUE COPY/
N OFFICER
To,
? /
I I I II i I I
I
HIGH COIJRT
DATED t0tgl02l2026
JUDGMENT
S
Z.
C)
2 B [[B 202fi
t
t
WA.No.1,l8 of 2026
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOU COSTS
5rfl'l,
Vr-
€S(a6
. .::.:-1.-,::r:
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Cubbon Road, Bangalore and 3 others
N. Sharada
Apparao Srinivas
G M Mohiuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
