Dismissed¶60

E. Ishwarya Reddy v. M/s Shriram Chits Pvt. Limited

Telangana HC3 Feb 2026CRP/36/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; CRP No. 36 of 2023; dismissed for non-prosecution; Section 115 CPC revision; order of attachment dated 03.12.2022; E.P. No. 175 of 2019; ABR/CF No. 96 of 2013; Principal Junior Civil Judge LB Nagar Ranga Reddy District; attachment of salary; decree holder M/s Shriram Chits Pvt. Ltd.; garnishee Accounts Officer Chief Commissionerate Land Administration; I.A. No. 2 of 2023; Section 151 CPC stay; no order as to costs; Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy; decided 03.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Even on the date the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there was no representation for the revision petitioner in either the pre-lunch or post-lunch session, indicating no inclination to pursue the case. ¶37

E. Ishwarya Reddy Vs M/s Shriram Chits Pvt. Limited — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[³⁴⁸⁶ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{VAKITI RAMAKRISHNAREDDY}

¶6

CIVIL REV!SION PETITIO N NO: 36 OF 2023

¶7

Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C aggrieved^{by the Order of attachment} passed on 03/1 2t2022 in E.P.No. 175 of 2019 in ABR/CF.No.96^{of 2013 on the file of} the Principal Junior Civil Judge,^{LB Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.}

¶8

Between:

¶9

E. lshwarya Reddy, s/o D. Janardhan, aged^{43 years,Occ. Junior Assistant,} o/o the Chief Commissioner of^{Land Administration, Nampally, Hyderabad.}

¶10

..Petitioner (J.Dr.No.2/Opponent^No.2)

¶11

AND

¶12

M/s Shriram Chits Pvt. Limited, Vanastalipuram^{Branch, rep. by its GPA} Holder -cum- Senior Manager Mr. G.^{SrinivasaRao s/o Peda Veeraiah}

¶13

...Respondent (Decree Holder/Disputant)

¶14

Mr. V. Yadagiri Reddy, s/o V.Ram^{Reddy, aged about4T Yrs., Occ:Business,} rlo H.No.8-6-117/5, Plot No. 236^{Balanagar Nagar, NagarjunaColony,} Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad.

¶15

ti/lr. J. Venkataiah, s/o J.Jangaiah,^{aged 47 Yrs., Occ. Business,r/o Plot} No.15/A, Shiva Ganga Colony, Karmanghat,^{Saroornagar,Hyderabad.}

¶16

A. Raju Goud, S/o. A. Ramulu^{Goud, aged 39 years, Occ. Business,Sri Sai} Kirana and General Stores, r/o^Plot No.^{387, Hariharapuram Colony,} B.N. Reddy Nagar, Vanastalipuram,^Hyderabad.

¶17

...Respondents(J.Dr.Nos.1,3 and^{4/Opponents Nos.1,3and 4)}

¶18

The Accounts OfficerIl-he^{SecretaryAdministration,o/o the Chief} Commissionerate Land Administration,^{Nampally, Hyderabad.}

¶19

..Respondent (Gharnishee)

¶20

l.A. NO: 2 Ott 2023

¶21

Petition underSection 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit f led in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including attachment of salary pursuant to the order of attachment passed in E.P.No.175 of 2019 in ABR/CF No.96 of 2013 dt 3/1212022 on the file of the PrincipalJunior Civil Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the main C R P , in the interest of justice.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DONTIREDDY SRINIVAS REDDY (NO REPRESENTATTON)

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N SRIKANTH GOUD

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶26

THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITT RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

¶27

Civil Revision Petition No.36 of 2023

Date: 03.02.2026

Between:

E. Ishwarya Reddy

... Petitioner

ANt)

M/s. Shriram Chits Private Limited, Vanasthalipuram Branch, Rep. by its GPA Holder - cum - Senior Manager, Mr. G. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Pedda Veeraiah and lour others ...Respondents

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

Mr. N. Srikanth Goud, learned counsel appearing for the

¶36

respondent No.1 appeared through virtual mode.

¶37

A perusal of the docket proceedings discloses that on earlier two occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the^petitioner. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner either in the pre-lunch session or post-lunch session. It appears that the revision petitioner has no inclination to^pursue this case

¶38

lrII ll !

¶39

¶40

In view of the above facts.and circumstances, the civil Revision

¶41

Petitiorr is Iiable to be dismissed for non - prosecution.

¶42

4' A.ccordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disrnissed for non

¶43

prosecu.ion. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶44

Miscellaneous^petitions, pending if any, shalr stand closed.

¶45

SD/. M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Prin:ipal Junior Civil Judge , LB Nagar, Ranga 2. One CC to Sri Dontireddy Srin ivas Reddy, Advocate [OpUC 3. One CC :o Sri N S rikanth Goud, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CD rlopies

District

ABK /PSL

'i' L

/
?

HIGH COURT