Puppala Ramakanth And Another Vs Dandu Srinivas… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

Puppala Ramakanth And Another Vs Dandu Srinivas… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous applications closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether, after the suit in O.S.No.67 of 2018 was disposed of by judgment and decree dated 29.12.2022, any cause survives in C.R.P.No.2018 of 2022 challenging the order dated 18.02.2022 in I.A.No.448 of 2018.

Court's answer

In view of the development that the suit in O.S.No.67 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Judge at Mahabubnagar has already been disposed of by judgment and decree dated 29.12.2022, the cause in the present civil revision petition no longer survives for further adjudication.

Ratio / Principle

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Key takeaways

There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶46
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶47

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition No.2018 of 2022 (under Article 227 of the Constitution of India), High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, J.), decided 04.02.2026. Puppala Ramakanth and another, represented by GPA holder Joggu Ashok Kumar, challenged the order dated 18.02.2022 in I.A.No.448 of 2018 in O.S.No.67 of 2018 of the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar, which per the cause-title confirmed the order and decree dated 25.01.2019 in I.A.No.1448 of 2018 in O.S.No.67 of 2018 of the Senior Civil Judge, Shadnagar; interlocutory applications sought suspension of the confirmatory order and an injunction against interference with the petitioners' possession over the schedule property (dilapidated house No.1-53 old 2-137, Shadnagar). At hearing the Court was informed that the underlying suit O.S.No.67 of 2018 had been disposed of by judgment and decree dated 29.12.2022; holding that the cause no longer survived, the Court dismissed the revision petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs and closure of pending miscellaneous applications. No precedent was cited or discussed.

[³⁴⁸⁶ ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY IWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{VAKITI RAMAKRISHNAREDDY}

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:^{2018 OF 2022}

Petition under^pflicle 227 of^the constitution^{of lndra, aggrievedby the orderdated} 18lO2l2O2 passed in c.l,4.A No B/20',l9 on^{the file of court of the PRINCIPAL DISTRICT} JUDGE at I/AHABUBNAGAR,^{confirming lhe order and Decreedaled 2510112019} passed in l.A No 1144812018 in O.S No^6712018 on^{the file of the SENIORClvll} JUDGE at SHADNAGAR,

Between:

Puppala Ramakanth, S/o. Prahalad,^{Aged 43 years, Occ. Business,}

Puppala Rajanikantfr, S/o.^{Prahalad, Aged 35 years,Occ. Business}

(Bdth are Rio. H.No. 6-10-511 , Prashanth Colony,^{Shrrampally,Rajendranagar} Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 500^{030,Rep. by theirGPAHolder Joggu Ashok} Kumar, S/o. Venkatiah, Aged 34^{years,Occ. Business'R/o. H'No 7 29'} Nagerguda Village, Shabad Mandal,^{IvlahabubnagarDistrict 509216)}

...PETITIONERS

AND

Dandu Srinivas, S/o.^{Narasimulu, Aged 45years'OccBusiness'} R/o. H.No. 1-1 5, Keshampet^{Road, Shadnagar,IVlahabubnagarDistrict 509 216'}

2 Aganur Vishwam, S/o.^{Rachappa,Aged 50 years, Occ. Municipal Chairman,} R/o. H.No 8, Grandhalaya Lane,^{Shadnagar, MahabubnagarDistrict 5Og 216'}

Baber Khan, S/o Galib Ali Khan,^{Aged 58 years, Occ: Dy' Sarpanch'R/o H No} 2-4, Faroognagar Village and^{Mandal, Shadnagar'IvlahabubnagarDistrtct} s09 2016.

Konakall Chenna,ah. S/o K Charidraiah, Aged 48 years, Occ Counsellor, R/o l- No. 5-10 f atel Road Shaclnaqar. lVahabLrbnagar Drstrict 509 216

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition Lrnder Si:ctron .l 5l CF'C prayrng that ln the clrcumstances stated in the affidavrt filecl rn suppori of thC petitron. the llrgh Court may be pleased to suspend the operatron of the orde C IVI A Bi 201 I on the f rle of Prrncipal District Judge at lVlahabubn:rg::r confrrrn ng the orcjer and Decree daled 2510112019 in LA No 144812018 ir 0 S No^{t)t tZO1t,} cn the file of the SENlOtl CIVIL JUDGE at SHADNAGAR and pass such other.otJer or orderrs that thrs Honble Oourt may deem fit and proper rn the circumstances of th: case. SCHEDULE PROPER TY All that the dilapidated house bearrng No. 1-53 (oldl 2-137 (Ncur) open aiea adnreasuring 368 Sq. yards situated at Shadnagar I o\vn AN[) l\ilunic palrty Farooqnagar lt4andal, Ranga Reddy Distnct and bounded by. North Po:hula Sherr SandhLr South llouse of Banjara Venkatiah house East . Keshanrpet Roa0 YVest lioad

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Sectron 151 CPC pray ng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petitron the High Court may be pleased to grant an order of injunctron restrainrng the Respondents and their henchmen from ever interfering with Petitroner's Possessron over the Plarnt Schedule Property.

Counsel for the Petitioners Sri Subrahmanyam Kurella

Counsel for the Respondents Sri P Nagen d ra Reddy

The Court made the tollowing ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA A'I'HYDERABAD

.IIIE HON'BLE SRI JUS't'ICE VAKTTI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

C.R.P.No.20l8 of 2022

Datc:O4.02.2026

Betrvecn:

Puppala Ramakanth and anotltcr

.. . Petitioners

AND

Dandu Srinivas and thrce others

...Respondcnts

o R D E R

This Civil Revision Pctition is filed aggrieved by^{the order} dated 18.02.2022 passed in I A.No.448^{of 2018 in O.S.No.67 oi20l8} on the file of learned Principal Distnct Judge^{at Mahabubnagar}

Heard Sri Subrahmanyam Kurella, leamed counsel lor^the petitioners and Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned^{counsel for the} respondents

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it^{is brought to the} notice of the Court that thc suitⁱⁿ O.S.No.67 of^{2018 on the file of}

-rr

leamed Principal District Judge at Mahabubnagar has already been

rlisposed of vi r/c.iud gn.renl and <lecrce datcd 29.12.2022.

+. lu vie rv ol the abi,r'c dcr clopmcnt, c:ruse in thc present crvil

levision pctition no longcr survivcs litr lurtltcr adjudication.

-5. Aocordintly. this^('ivil Itevision lrctition is dismissed as

infiuctuous. fherc sltall bc uo ordel as to cosls

Miscellanrrous l)ctitions, pcnding ilanv. shall stand closed.

SD/- A.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

//TRUE COPy/t

I
SECTION OFFICER
,)

1 The Princrpal Drstrrct Judge At Mahabubnagar

The Senror Civil Jud1le At Shadnagar

3 One CC to SRI SUBRAI-1MANyAN/ KURELLA Advocate tOpUCl

4 One CC to SRt P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate tOpUCl

Two CD Copies

Ir\r,\t Wc../ w'--

HIGH COURT

DATED: 04102t2026

ORDER

CRP.No.2018 of 2O22

( CF. I !l.t s l4
o
I l z
.)
,

:Q
PA

DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

J l .l l, c