V.S. Rao Munjuluri Vs P. Sukhender Reddy — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

V.S. Rao Munjuluri Vs P. Sukhender Reddy — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

[³⁴⁸⁶ ]

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

IVONDAY. THE NINTH DAY OF^FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{VAKITI RAMAKRISHNAREDDY}

CIVIL REVIS ION PETITION^{NO: 2840 OF 2022}

Petition under Article^{227 of lhe Constrtutionof lndra, aggrieved by the} Order dated 02 Og-2022^{passed in l A No 34 of 2022 rn O S No 6'1 of 2022 on lhe} frle of the Court of the V Junior^{Civil Judge. Crty Civil Court, Hyderabad'}

Between:

V.S. Rao lVlunjuluri^{S/o. Late Sheshagi} ri Rao Aged about 49 Years,^Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No,^{203. A BIock,R} K Cpuntry, Manrkonda,^HYd-89,And 6/A and B & 6³ 666/4/1402.^{4" Floor.} Otfice Hexagon Associates,^mH.No.6-366 Lumbini Towers, Panjagutta,^Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER/DEFENDANT

AND

'1 . P, Sukhender Reddy, S/o P Rala Reddy, Age. 66 years, Occ: Business,

P. Neeta Reddy,^{Wo P Sukhender Reddy, Age:60 years, Occ'Business}

P. Kireet Reddy, S/o^{P SukhenderReddy, Age:40 years,Occ: Busrness}

Nos. 1 to 3 are residing^{at House No.23A, Dews VillaManchirevula,} Rajendranagar^{tVlandal,Hyderabad.}

4 P Sudhanand Reddy, S/o^{P Rajareddy, Age.} 70 years, Occ: Business^R/o Flat No.401, Lumbini Enclave,^{Panjagutta,Hy} derabad.

...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under section 151^{CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed^{in support of the petrtion, the Highcourt may be pleasedto} suspendtheorderpassedinlANo.34l2O22dated02-09-2022inOSNo' 61t2022 on the file of^{V JuniorCivilJudge, Hyderabadand pass}

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRl.BHASKAR GANDHAM}

counsel for the^{Respondents:P vIDYA SAGAR REDDY (No Representation)}

The Court made the^{following: ORDER}

IN TH}, HIGII^{COUR'I' F'OR THF], STATE, OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

-IHE llON'lll.h SRI .ltiS'l'ICl- /AKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

('.R.P.N o.2tl10 of 2022

l):'I'E D :09.02.2026

Iletu'ccn:

'.S. I{iro \lurrjtrlLrri,

... ['ctitioner

ANt)

I'. Strkhcrrclcr ReJclv^{arrd I Otl'rcls}

. ..llespondcnts

::ORl)l:lL::

IIris^('ir il llcr isiorr^l)ctitionrs 1l lerl ap.slie^vcd b1^{tlrr- ordcr}

clateil 01 09.1022^{passeclin t.A.No.-i4of 2022 in O S No'6 I ol 2021} on rlrc lltc o1'Icar-ncd^{V Junioi. Civil Judge, ('it) Civil Court at} I J r'<lu't abucl

L I Itarcl sri Ilhnskai^{(iandharn.Iearnecicouuscl ibr thc pctitioner} l hcrc is n() rclr^{leserr tat} ion^{orl bchalf of thc rcspcrndcnts}

i. Whcn tlre rliltter is taken^trp for^{liearing, it is broughtto the} noticc ol' thc^{('otrt't that thc suit in O.S.No-61 ol 2022 on the fi[e ol'} learned V Junior Civil^{Judge, City Civil Courl at Hyderabad has} alleadr lrecn^{clisl-roseclo1- ulrle} -iudgment^{and decree dated23.04.2024'}

I-

)

In view of the above developrnent, cause in the present civil

revision petition no longer survivcs lor furlher adjudication.

Accordingh. this Civ il ltevision Pctitior.r is dismissed as

in ltuctuoLrs. There shal I be no ordel as to costs

Miscellaneor-rs Petitions, perrding if anl . shall stand closed

SD/- K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGIST

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

\

To \ 1 The V Junror Civrl Judge. Crty^{Crvrl Court.Hyderabda}

One CC to SRl. Bhaskar Gandham^Advocate [OPUC] 3 One CC to SRl. P Vidya Sagar^{Reddy, Advocate} [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies

Pr/PS

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0910212026

ORDER CRP.No.2840 ot 2022

r
( oR THE S T4
.a<br>(:
oo. / J ilro r41q ('

'1'.^1,6:o
:-'-:--'

DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS lr ' r) -,lh-l ..-'e>lzl2 ^t 6