Dismissed¶36

Bandi Srikanth v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Feb 2026CRLP/8630/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; CRLP No. 8630 of 2021; Bandi Srikanth and two others v. The State of Telangana and Mrs. Goli Santhoshini (complainant); petition under S.482 Cr.P.C. to quash C.C. No. 382 of 2021 (III Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, through P.S. Medipally); dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies; no merits decision; no precedents discussed; Tirumala Devi Eada, J.; decided 04.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed ¶36

Bandi Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

134441

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI^EADA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8630 OF²⁰²¹

¶7

BETWEEN

¶8

Bandi Srikanth S/o- Yadaiah Aged 37^{years, Occi Business,R/o H. No. 5-3-} 1/249, Phase - lll, RNS Colony, Boduppal,^{t\Iedipellylvlandal, tvledchel-} tt/alkajig iri District - 500092.

¶9

Bandi Raju @ Rajkumar S/o.^Yadaiah, Aged^{35 years, Occ Bustness, R/o. H.} No. 5-3-1/249, Phase - lll, RNS Colony,^{Boduppal, It/edtpellyIr4andal,} I/edchel - Malkajigiri Diskict -^500092.

¶10

Bandi Kavitha Wo. Srikanth,^{Aged 35 years, Occ. House wife, R/o H. No. 5-} 3-1t249, Phase - lll, RNS Colony,^{Boduppal,t\Iedipelly Mandal,IVledchel -} Malkajigiri District - 500092.

¶11

...Petitioner/Accused Nos.1^{to 3}

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Represented^{by the Public Prosecutor'At High} Court, at Hyderabad

¶14

Mrs. Goli Santhoshini Wo.^{ShravanKumar, Aged 40 years,Occ: House wife,} R/o. P. No.33, C -^{Block, RNS Colony, Boduppal,IVledipellylvlandal,Ivledchel} - lvlalkajigiri District - 500092.

¶15

...ResPondenUComPlainant

¶16

Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances stated in} the lvlemorandum of Grounds^of Criminal^{Petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} quash the proceedings in c.c. No. 382 ot 2021^{on the file of lll ttiletropolitan} t,4agistrate, Ranga Reddy District at^{L. B. Nagarthrough PS t\4edipelly againstthe} petitioner-

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶18

Petition under section^{482of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in} the Memorandum of Grounds^of Criminal^{Petition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto} stay all further^proceedings including^{appearance of the petitioner in c.c. No. 382 of} 2021 on the file of the lll Metropolitan^{lvlagistrate,Ranga Reddy District at L.B'} Nagar pending disposal of^this Quash^petition

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Merr rrandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sr /emuganti Mahesh Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and The Public Prosecr.rl )' on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No 2 .

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶22

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8630 of 2021

¶24

Dale:04.02.2026

¶25

Between: