Dismissed¶61

Rathod Tukaram v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Jan 2026CRLP/7150/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court (Tirumala Devi Eada J., 08-01-2026) in Crl.P. No.7150 of 2025: quash petition under S.528 BNSS by Accused No.2 against FIR No.94/2025, P.S. Bichkunda, Kamareddy (Ss.118(1), 115(2) r/w 3(5) BNS); dismissed as infructuous since charge sheet filed and C.C.No.131/2025 numbered; liberty to seek appropriate remedies; no precedents cited; single-judge order.

What did the court decide?

On the learned Additional Public Prosecutor's submission that the charge sheet in Crime No.94 of 2025 has been filed and the Calendar Case is numbered C.C.No.131 of 2025, the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive for adjudication. ¶37

Rathod Tukaram Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

134441

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH^{DAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYSIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SMTJUSTICETIRUMALA DEVI EADA}

¶6

CRIMINAL PE^{TITION NO: 7150 OF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Rathod Tukaram, S/o. Rathod Govind, Aged. 54^{Years, Occ.} Former S/o.H.No.1-91, Yellaram, Bichkunda trlandal,^{Pulkal,Kamareddy} District, Telangana-503306.

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED^No.2

¶10

AND

¶11

The state of^{Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High court for} the State of Telangana^HYderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENT^{No. 1}

¶13

Swapna Chavan, Wo.^{Balaram,Age!,39 years, Occ Farmer,Yellaram}

¶14

injnOr, Bichkunda, Yellaram, Kamareddy, Telangana-503306.

¶15

...RESPONDENT No.^{2/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT}

¶16

Petition under section^{528 of BNSS prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminalPetition, the High court may} be pleased to^quash the^{proceedings against the Petitioner/AccusedNo. 2 in FIR} No.g4 oF 2o25, on the^{file of P.S Bichkunda'Kamareddydistrict,Telangana,} dated03'04.2025,registeredfortheoffencesundersectionllB(1),115(2),R/w. 3(5) ofthe BNS.

¶17

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025

¶18

Petition under Section^{528 of BNSS prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may} bepleasedtograntstayofallfurtherproceedingsincluding.arrestofthe petiiioner/Accu..O t'to. 2 in respect FIR NO.94 OF 2025,^{on the file of P.S} Bichkunda, Kamareddy^{district,Telangana,dated 03.04.2025, registeredfor the} offences under section^{1 18(1),1 15(2), R/w.3(5)of the BNS,till disposal of the} main quash^proceedings.

¶19

./ /

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing te Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argurr,:nts of M/s- Shalini Pawar( No Representation), Advocate for the Petitioner, F i.rblic Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the ll^,rspondent No. 2.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶23

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶24

CRIMINAL PETITION N o.7150 0F 2025

DATE:08-01-2026

Between

Rathod Tukaram

Petitioner

And

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and another

¶31

... Respondents

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.2 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.94 of 2025 of Bichkunda Police Station, Kamareddy District.

¶34

None appears for the petitioner

¶35

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that charge sheet is filed in the said crime before the Court concerned and that the Calendar Case is numbered as C.C.No.i3'l of 2025.

¶36