A Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition seeking quashment of C.C.No.1414 of 2021 (offences under Sections 279, 338 IPC and Sections 185(a), 196 MV Act) was dismissed as infructuous because the case had already been settled before Lok Adalat on 14.12.2024; no proposition of general application decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
134441
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA N 5890
Between
Sanapalli Saneeth Reddy, S/o Ravi prasad Reddy, aged about 30 years, Occ: business, R/o Villa No.A-9, Dews Ville, Manchirlvula village, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District.
...petitioner/Accused
AND
...Respondents
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to quash the proceedings in c.c.No.1414 ot 2021 on the fire of the rv Additionar Junior civil Judge-cum-XV Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate, Medchal District, at Kukatpally, registered for the offences punishable under sections 279, 338 lpc and Sections 185 (a), 1 96 of the Motor vehicres Act, against the petitioner in the interest ofjustice.
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to grant stay of all further proceedings in c.c.No.1414 of 2021 on the file of the lV Additional Junior civir Judge-cum-XV Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate, Medchar District, at Kukatparry, registered for the offences puniihabre undlr sections 279, 338 lPc and sections 18s (a), 196 of the Motor Vehicres Act, against the petitioner, including anest of the petitioner herein, pending disposal of the main criminal petition.
This l)etition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds rf criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments ot sri N Mukurrda Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and sri D. Arun Kumir, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court nrade the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTTCETIRUMALA DEVI EADA
NAL P
DATE OF ORDER:11.02.2026
Between
Sanapalli Saneeth ReddY
..Petitioner/Accused
AND
The State of TelanganareP. bY Public Prosecutor & another
...ResPondents
ORDER
2.ltVhen the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted a copy of Case Details informertion pertaining to the subject c.c.No.1414 of 2021 which discloses that the said cc was settled before Lok-Adalat on 14.12.2:.024. Hence, the cause in the Criminal Petition seeking quash of the said CC does not survive and has become infructuous.
closed.
Sd/. P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
l
OFFICER /
To,
/Irt ry/' AI}K /BA
.---:-:-::
!
,
HIGH COUITT
DATED: 11i02t2026
ORDER
CRLP.No.S890 of 2023
,
THE s
o
1 2 l,{R 20n a
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTI'OUS
v
e<br>
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Sanapalli Saneeth Reddy
The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor
Chatharaju Nikhil
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
