Dismissed¶33

Suresh Gupta v. The Central Bureau of Investigation and another

Telangana HC9 Feb 2026CRLP/5842/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana HC CRLP 5842/2020 (decided 09.02.2026): section 482 CrPC quash petition against CBI/ACB Hyderabad FIR filed by Suresh Gupta (Accused No. 7; respondents CBI and IFCI Limited); associated stay application IA No. 20 of 2020; petition permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedies according to law; counsel Bommeneni Vivekananda (petitioner), T. Srujan Kumar Reddy (SPPL/SC for CBI), M.V. Kini (Respondent 2); no finding on quashability - citable only as a record of withdrawal, not for any ratio on FIR quashing.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek appropriate remedies according to law. ¶33

Suresh Gupta Vs The Central Bureau of Investigation and another — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAO

¶2

MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY SIX

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA OEVI EADA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:58420F 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

Suresh Gupta, S/o. Radhakrisluian Ramaswamy Aged about 56 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Ftat No. 304, t_j_618N, Vincinyi npartmenti,,AmeLlpei, Hyderabad 500 082

¶8

AND

¶9

.....PETIT|ONER/ACCUSED NO 7

¶10

1 The Central Bureau of lnvestigation and another, ACB Hyderabad police Station, Rep. by its speciat p;btic pros;;ui;, Hifi c";;i;uirdings, ai^- l'.lyderabad.

¶11

2 M/s lFCl Limited, Rep by Deputy General Manager Law, Having its Office at lFCt, Taramandat crimprex, Saiiauaa, r_ir<oi r;Fioj,-i'vj"i"o"d - 5oooo4. Also at tFCt Limited, Rdsd.'omce. irciioweior NJrill pll"e, New Dethi _ 1 10 019.

¶12

.....RESPONDENT/S

¶13

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminil Fetition, the High C;rt;;y be pleased to cail for the records rerating to FIR No. icO3szozoioooe, on thi file of CBI ACB Police Station, HyderaOiO, anO quash the proceedings in the abovd FlR. against the petitioner/Accused

¶14

t.A. NO: 20F 2020

¶15

Petition under section 4g2 of cr.p.c praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of crounds ot Ciiminai petition, in" Hign Court may be pleased t9_SIan! stay of afl further proceedings in Fti No. nCdSSZOZoAOOo6, ;; the file of cBr AcB porice station, Hyderabid, incruding tne appearance oi'tne Accused and framing of the charges tiir the disposar or inl aoove euash petition

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing ,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri BoMMTNENT VIVEKANANDA ,Advocate for the petitioner and the SRt T.SRUJAN KUMAR REDDY SPL^pubric prosecutor FoR cBr on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M.V. KlNl Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA}

¶19

AT HYDERABAD

¶20

TIIE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE^{TIRUMALA DEVIEADA}

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION^{No.5842 oI 2020}

¶22

Date:09.02.2026

¶23

Between:

¶24

Suresh Ciupta^{S/o. Radha KrishnanRamaswamy}

¶25

... Petitioner/comPlainant

¶26

And

¶27

The Central Bureau^{of lnvestigation,} ACB, Hyderabad^{Police Station,} Rep. by ils Special^{PublicProsecutor,} High Court buildings,^{Hyderabadand another'}

¶28

Respondents

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Leerrned counsel for^{the petitioner seeks permission to}

¶31

withdraw the^criminal Petition.

¶32