Dismissed¶¶38

Manoj Kumar , Radha Krishnan Manoj Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Feb 2026CRLP/287/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRLP No.287 of 2021, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, order dated 09.02.2026 (Tirumala Devi Eada, J.): Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition concerning C.C.No.4774 of 2018 (Sections 447 and 427 read with 34 IPC, XXV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally) dismissed for non-prosecution; no representation for petitioners across listings and counsel for respondent No.2 reported no instructions; liberty to seek appropriate remedies if cause of action survives; pending miscellaneous applications closed; no holding on the merits.

What did the court decide?

None appeared for the petitioners on call or on the last date of listing (02.02.2026), counsel for respondent No.2 reported no instructions from his client, and it appeared that the petitioners had no interest in prosecuting the case. ¶¶37

Manoj Kumar , Radha Krishnan Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 287 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Manoj Kumar@ Radha Krishnan Manoj Kumar, S/o Radha Krishnan, Aged about 47 years, Occ. NRl, R/o Flat No.508, F-Block, Satyanarayana Enclave, Madinaguda, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500049, rep.by his GPA holder Mr, R.S. Babu, S/o Ranganthan Sambhandhan, aged about 51 years, Occ. Business, Rlo 1-10-52, Sth floor, Flat No.500, Anusha Apa(ments, Chikoti Gardens, Begumpet, Hyderabad-5000 1 6

¶8

Talupula Srinivas, S/o Talupula Sudhakar, Aged about 42^years, Occ. Business, R/o Plot 964, near Senticies Vita High School, Waidia colony, Hyderabad

¶9

.....PETITIONERS'ACCUSED NO A1 & A2

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶12

Syed Gularn Mohammed Kamran, S/o SA Saleem, Aged about 29^years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.114614/1/A, Moghal Maisaan Apartments,^New AC Guards Road, Hyderabad

¶13

.....RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased tot quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/ Accusedⁱⁿ C.C.No.4774 of 2018 for the offences^punishable under Section 447 and 427 RM/ 34 l.P.C., pending on the file of the learned XXV Metropolitan Magistrate. Cyberabad at Kukatpally

¶15

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition ,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.4774 ol 2018 for the offences punishable under Section 447 and 427 RIW 34 LP.C., pending on the file of the learned XXV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

¶18

Petrtion under Section 482 o( Cr.P.C^{prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to permit the GPA^{holder Mr. Venkat Subba Rayudu Duggirala} ,^S/o D.V.S.A. Nagendra Rao as the^present GPA^{Holderof the 1st petitioner by} deleting the name of Mr. R.S.Babu S/o^{Ranganathan Sambhandhan,the} previous GPA Holder of the 1st petitioner, and^pass.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^{perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the^{argumentsof Sri S S R} MURTHY ,Advocate for the Petitioners(not being^present)and the^Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1^and of^{SRI S.DINESH Advocate} for the Respondent No. 2

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA}

¶22

AT HYDERABAD

¶23

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA^{DEV! EADA}

¶24

CRIMIN AL PETITION No.287 ot 2021

¶25

DATE OF ORDER:09.02.2026

¶26

Between:

¶27

Manoj Kumar @ Radha Krishnan Manoj Kumar^{& another}

¶28

...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2

¶29

AND

¶30

The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor and another

¶31

-..Respondents

¶32

ORDER

¶33

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of The Code of Criminal Procedure (for short,^'Cr.P.C) seeking to^quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 in C.C.No.4774 of 2018, on the file of the learned XXV^Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 427 read with 34 of lPC,

¶34

None appeared for the^petitioners on call. lt was observed from the Proceedings Sheet that on the last date of listing the matter i.e., on 02.02.2026, there was no representation for the^petitioners

¶35

for the past so many occasions while the counsel for^respondent

¶36

¶37

No.2 reported no instructions from his client. Thus, the matter was ordered to be posted under the caption^,For Dismissal, to this day. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. lt appears that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the case.

¶38

Hence, the Criminal petition is dismissed for non_prosecution with a liberty to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedies according to law in case the cause of action survives.

¶39

4 Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed

¶40

SD/. K.MADHAVI TANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,