Dismissed

Panduga Bhapiraju v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Jan 2026CRLP/220/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners accused sought quashing of FIR in Crime No. 187 of 2025 of PS Boinipally under Section 528 BNSS. On hearing, counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

Panduga Bhapiraju Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

134441

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF^JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TI/VENTY^SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE^{TIRUMALA DEVIEADA}

¶6

CRIMINA L PETITION NO:^{220 OF 2026}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Panduga Bhapiraju, S/o.Bhumaiah^{aged about 34 years, Occ. Agrro-rlture All} are R/6. Vilasigai Village, Bornipallr^{lvlandal,Rajanna SircillaDist , TG}

¶9

Panduga Srikanth, S/o.Thirupathi^{agedabout29 years. Occ. Agriculture}

¶10

3 Panduga Prashanth, s/o.Bhumaiah,^{aged about 30 years. occ AgrrclltureAll} are R/d- Vilasagar Village,^{Boinipalli trrlandal Rajanna SircillaDrst',TG}

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED^{1 TO 3}

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana,^{Rep.. by its Pub|c Prosecutor, Hiqh Court for the} State of Telanganiat^{Hydeiabail, Through PS, Boinipalty,RajannaSircilla} Dist., TS..

¶14

...RESPONDENT NO^{1 /COMPLAINANT}

¶15

2 Pasula Sumanth @ Sudhakar,^{S/o. Anjaiah, aged about} l7.ysqs,^Occ,Labour Caste SC tvtadiga-R/o.^{VilasagarVillale.Boinipallilvlandal,Rajanna Sircilla} Dist, TG

¶16

...RESPONDENT NO 2 /DE-FACTO^COMPLAINANT

¶17

Petition under section 528 of^{BNSS prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminalPetition, the High court may} bepleasedtocallfortherecordsrelatingtoCrimeNo187of2025' dated.0B- 10-2025 of^{PS Boinipally, Rajanna sircilla Dist, TS, on the file of the} learned Judicial Magistrate of^{Ftrst class at Vemulawada TG and quashthe} same against the^{petitioners/accusedNo.'1to 3 and pass suchother orderor} orders in the interest of iustice.

¶18

l.A. NO:2OF 2026

¶19

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitron, he High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arre; of the petitioners/ accused No 1 to 3 rn Crime No^'1 87 of 2025. dated 08-10-2t t5 of PS Boinipally, Rajanna Sircilla Drst., TG, on the file of the learned Judic:i: Magistrate of First Class at Vemulawada TG, pending disposal of the above l minal petition and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusrnq I re N4emorandum of 1 Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing )e arguments of Sri Bethi Venkateswarlu, Advocate for. the Petitioner and tl r PLrblrc P roseculor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

¶23

¶24

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶25

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶26

CRIMINAL PETITION No.220 ot 2026

¶27

Date: 08.01.2026

¶28

Between:

¶29

Panduga Bhapiraju and two others

¶30

Petitioners/accused Nos.'1 to 3

¶31

) \

¶32

AND

¶33

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, Through P.S. Boinipally, Rajanna Sircilla District and another

¶34

.. Respondents

¶35

ORDER

¶36

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.^Bethi Venkateshwarlu, learned counsel for the^{petitionershavesought} permission to withdraw the criminal petition, with a liberty to

¶37

pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

¶38

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is <l ;missed as

¶43

withdrawn, with a liberty as sought for

¶44

Pending miscellaneous applications, if an1, shall stand

¶45

closed

¶46

SD/- K.MADHAVI ASI; STANT REGISTRAR

¶47

//TRUE COPY//

¶48

- <sup>'----=- SECTIoN oFFICER

¶49

To,

¶50

{

¶51

1 The Judicial lVlagistrate of First Class at Vemul:^,arada

¶52

2 The Station House Officer, Boinipally Police St: Iion, Rajanna Sircilla.

¶53

¶54

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the St rte of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶55

One CC to Sri Bethi Venkateswarlu, Advocate [OPUC]

¶56

Two CD Copies

SR/PSL

) \

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/O112026

ORDER

CRLP.No.220 of 2026

1H l:-
a;€><br>);
/: -l
{.i'
',-, i'lf I b 1I :1
\ r')\rt }!
+,
_ ...(,i'..r''
\r...,,. .. :i-.1:-

¶64

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WtTI DRAWN

¶65

a\at,

Panduga Bhapiraju v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panduga Bhapiraju v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bathula Anji Babu Vs the State of A.P.

N Suneeta, Vs The State of Telangana

Jakkula Ravikanth Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Sar Transport Vs The State of Telangana

Polavarapu Sridevi Vs The State of Telangana

Pottolla Mallaiah, Vs The State of Telangana