Dismissed¶39

Hamaid Bin Saleh a. Hameed v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Feb 2026CRLP/1827/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 CrPC quashment petition by accused dismissed as infructuous; compounding of offences punishable under Sections 324, 341, 506 IPC following amicable Lok-Adalat settlement; C.C. No. 8060/8050 of 2021, III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad; State of Telangana; petitioner unrepresented at hearing; interim stay application R.A. No. 1 of 2024 closed as sequela; no case law relied upon.

What did the court decide?

None - Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; as a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ¶39

Hamaid Bin Saleh a. Hameed Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶5

GRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1827 OF 2024

¶6

Between:

¶7

Hamaid Bin Saleh a. Hameed, S/o.^{Late. Saleh Bin Salam, Aged about 32} years, Occ - Business, R/o. H. No. 84-548114, Sulthan^{Nagar, Erragadda,SR} Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶8

..PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{its PublicProsecutor, High Court at} Hyderabad

¶11

Asif Hussain, S/o. Mohd Yahed^{Hussain, Aged about 31 years,Occ - Junior} Assistant, N o.7-249'5n4,^{DNM Colony,Sanath Nagar, Hyderabad, T.S.}

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court maybe} pleased to quash the proceedings against the^{petitioner/accused in C.C. No. 8050} of 2021 on the file of 3rd Addl.^{Chief Metropolitan Maziszrate. NampallyAt} Hyderabad, for the offences U/Sec.^{324.341. 506 of IPC}

¶14

r.A. NO : 1 OF 2024

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Courtmay be} pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.^{No. 8050 Of 2021 on the file of} Honble 3rd Addl. Chief Metropolitan^{Magistrate, NampallyAt Hyderabad.for the} offences U/Sec. 324, 341, 506 of^{tPC pendingdisposal of the above criminal} petition.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing,^{upon perusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of Crimina! Petition and^{upon hearing theargumentsof} Sri Mahmood Khan, Advocate^{(not present) for the Petitionerand Ms. M. Madhavi,} Additional Public Prosecutor^{on behalf of the Respondent No. 1, and None} appeared for ResPondent^{No. 2.}

¶17

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶18

tt I

¶19

IN THE HIGH COI'RT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶20

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI}

INAL ON 1827 0F 2024

D i 12.02. 26

Between:

Hamaid Bin Saleh @^Hameed

¶25

Petitioner

¶26

AND

¶27

The State of T,elangana^{and Another}

¶28

...ResPondents

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This Criminal Petition^{is filed under Section 482 of the Code of} criminal Proq=dure^{(for short 'cr.P.c,1973)seeking quashmentof the} proceedings against the^{petitioner in c.c.No.8060 of 2021 on the file of} the learned lll Additional^{Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally,} Hyderabad.

¶31

The petitioner is^{arrayed as accused in C.C.No.8060of 2021'} registered for the offences^{punishable under Sections324,341and 506 of} the lndian Penal Code.

¶32

None for the^petitioner

¶33

¶34

¶35

Heard Ms.S.Madhavi, learned^{Additional PublicProsecutor} appearing for respondent^{No.1 -State.}

¶36

S. Learned Additional Public^{Prosecutor on instructionswouldsubmit} that as the^{parties have amicably settled their disputes before the Lok-} Adalat, the offences in^{c.c.No.8050of 2021 were compoundedon} 2B.Og.2OZ4 before the learned^{lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate} at Nampally, Hyderabad.^{Thus,nothingfurther remains in this matterfor} consideration and^{prays for dismissal of the petition.}

¶37

t have perused the materials^{on record.}

¶38

Having regard to the^{prayer of the petitioner and the developments} thai transpired during^{the pendencyof this petition especiallyas the} Calendar Case itself^{has been closed and the offences were compounded,} it is clear that nothing^{further remainsin this matter for deliberation.}

¶39

Accordingly, the Criminal^{Petitionis dismissed as infructuous'}

¶40

As a sequel,^{pendingmiscellaneoushpplications, if any, shall stand}

¶41

closed

¶42

Sd/. P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGIS

I,I

,/TRUE COPY//

OFFICER

To,

The lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Nlagistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Sanjeev Reddy Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶48