M.Satishwar Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

M.Satishwar Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Both I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 and the Criminal Petition allowed; proceedings in C.C.No.13957 of 2021 against petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2 & 4 quashed, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- to the Director, Telangana Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana within two (02) weeks, with proof to be filed before the Registry; miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.13957 of 2021 against petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2 & 4 (offence under Section 324 r/w Section 34 IPC) before the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, should be quashed, the parties having compromised during pendency. +1 more

Court's answer

Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.13957 of 2021 pending before the learned XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad are hereby quashed, subject to the petitioners paying Rs.5,000/- to the Director, Telangana Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana within two (02) weeks and filing proof of the same before the Registry.

Ratio / Principle

The parties, having been identified by the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana (reports dated 22.12.2025 and 06.01.2026), willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise; in view of this, I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 are allowed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Tirumala Devi Eada, J.), 09.01.2026: I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 in/and Crl.P.No.17252 of 2025 — Allowed. Accused Nos.1, 2 & 4 (M. Satishwar, M. Maheshwar, Smt. M. Sanjana) petitioned under S.528 BNSS to quash proceedings in C.C.No.13957 of 2021 (offence under S.324 r/w S.34 IPC) before the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. During pendency the parties compromised; respondent No.2/defacto complainant (Miryalkar Raju) filed I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 under S.359(6) and S.359(2) BNSS seeking permission to compound the offences, record the compromise and quash. After the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee identified the parties and reported (22.12.2025 and 06.01.2026) that they willfully and without coercion entered into compromise, the Court allowed both I.As and the Criminal Petition and quashed the C.C. proceedings, conditioned on payment of Rs.5,000/- to the Director, Telangana Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks, proof to be filed before the Registry. Miscellaneous applications closed. The Registry subsequently recorded payment of the total Rs.10,000/- by counsel (USR No.8145 of 2026 dated 23-01-2026).

134441

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

l.A.Nos.2&3of2025 in/and

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17252 OF 2025

Betvveen:

'l tvl.satishwar, S/o.lvl.Kishanji, Aged 34 years, Occ. Unemployee Rio.Flat No 504, Amanath Residency, Anand Nagar, Khairathabad,^Hyderabad.

M.lvlaheshwar, S/o M.Kishanji, Aged 4B^years, Occ: Civil Contractor,^{R/o Flat} No.504, Amanath Residency, Anand Nagar, Khairathabad, Hyderabad.

Smt.Ir4. San;ana, Wo.Maheshwar, Aged 43^years, Occ:^{Housewife,R/o FIat} No.504, Amanath Residency, Anand Nagar, Khairathabad,^Hyderabad.

...Petitioners/Accused No.1,2 & 4

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,^{High Courtof} Telangana at Hyderabad. ...Respondent

2 Itliryalkar Ralu, S/o.Sadulla, Aged 63 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.5^45, Deveryamjal, Shamirpet Mandal,^IVledchal District.

...Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant

3 tVliryalkar Sandeep, S/o [t/liryalkar Raju, Aged Major, Occ:^Busitress, R/o.H.No.5-45, Deveryamjal, Shamirpet Mandal, Medchal District.^(VlCTlM)

4 tVliryalkar Sai kiran, S/o Miryalkar Raju, Aged Major, Occ: Business, R/o.H No.5-45, Deveryamjal, Shamirpet Mandal, Medchal District^(VlCTlM)

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS^praying that in the circumstances^statedin the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^Petition, the High^{Court may be pleased} to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.13957 of 2021 on the^file of the^Hon'bleXIV Additional Chief lriletropolitan^{ltrlagistrate,} at Hyderabad, against^the Petitioners/Accused No.1, 2 &^4.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that r the circumstances stated in the lt/emorandunr of Grounds of criminal^petitiorr the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedrngs in C.C.No.13! !l of 2O21 on the file of the Hon'ble XIV Additronal Chief [r/etropolitan lvlagi:; ate, at Hyderabad. against the Petitio n e rs/A ccu sed No 1. 2 & 4. pendinq : spo:;al of the marn Criminal Petition.

LA. NO: 2OF 2025

Between:

Irrliryalkar Ra1u, S/o.Sadulla, Aged 63 years. Occ Busr ess R/o.H.No 5-45 Deveryamjal, Shamlrpet lVlandal, I/ledchal District.

...Petitioner/Respondent No.2r I efacto Complainant

Miryalkar Sandeep, S/o l\rliryalkar Raju, Aged Malor, Occ. Bu; ress, R/o H.No 5-45, Deveryamlal, Shamirpet Mandal, Medchal Drstrict. (vtcTlrv)

3 Miryalkar Sai kiran, S/o l/iryalkar Ralu. Aged lvlajor, Occ: Bu; ress, R/o H No.5-45 Deveryamjal, Shamirpet Mandal, I/edchal District (vtclM) AND

'1. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High ( ou rt of Telangana at Hyderabad. ...Respondent No.1i Respondent ,Jo.1/Com pla ina nt

1. M.Satishwar, S/o.t/ Kishanli, Aged 34 years. Occ Unempl,r ee R/o Flat No.504. Amanath Residency, Anand Nagar, Khairathabad, Hyderabad

M.Maheshwar, S/o.lr,I.Kishanji, Aged 48 years, Occ Civi Contractor. R/o Flat No.504, Amanath Residency, Anand Nagar, Khairathabad, Hyc : ra bad.

Smt.M.Sanjana, Wo.Maheshwar, Aged 43 years, Occ. House,, 'ite, R/o Flat No 504, Amanath Residency, Anand Nagar, Kharrathabad, Hyderabad ...Respondent No.2 to 4/Petitioner:; \cc used No.1,2 & 4

Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that i the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition he lligh Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to frle compromise petiticr in C C.No.13957 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble Xlv Addrtional chief tr4etro r rlitan Magislrate, at Hyderabad against the Pe titioners/Accu sed.

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under section 359(2) of BNSS praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition. re tligh court may be pleased to record the compromise by quashing te l)roceedings in c.c.No.13957 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'bte XtV Additicri chief tr/etropolitan I\Iagistrate, at Hyderabad, in record of the compromrse be r reen the peiitioner and the Respondent No.2A,/ictim 3 and 4

This Petrtion coming on for hearing, upon perusing t e lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petrtion and upon hearing the a r uments of sri p. vamsheedhar Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners and thr: Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the R. ;po.dent No 1 and of Sri Syed Asham, Advocate for the Respondent No 2 to 4.

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

I I

I I I I i I I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT} HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI^EADA

l.A.Nos.2&3of2025

in/and c RIMINAL PETITION No.17252 of 2025

Date: 09.01.2026

Between:

M. Satishwar and two others

.Petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2 &⁴

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public^Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad and^threeothers.

.. . Respondents

COMMON ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section⁵²⁸ of^Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023^(for short^{'BNSS') seekingto quash} the proceedings against the^{petitioners/accusedNos.1, 2 & 4 in} C.C.No.13957 of 2021,^pending on the file of^{the learnedXIV} Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad,^{rdgisteredfor}

the offence punishable under Section 324 rlw Section^{34 of lPC.}

lt is submitted by learned counsel for the^{petitioners/accused} \

Nos., 2 & 4 as well as respondent No.2 that during^{pendencyof the}

2

t

no,1 t.A.Nos.2 E3 al2025 in/ond crlp No.17252 oJ 2025

present Criminal Petition, the parties have comprr,r rised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 have been filed by respondent No.2/defacto complainant seeking perrnission to compound the offences, to record compromise a r C to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in the above crirr :.

3 The learned Additional public prosecutor I i s opposed the compromise petition

Since the parties were willing to enter into c: npromise, they were given a chance to setfle the matter by appe: ,ing along with therr respective counsel before the High Court .egal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dz ed 1g.12.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court .egal Services committee shall identify the parties and submit a rep: 1to that effect.

Pursuant to the above said direction issued b I this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have apperi red before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State oi^.elangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified t e parties and submitted a report dated 22.12.2025 and 06.01.2026 r tating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, withor-t any coercion, entered into compromise.

II

3

ETD) t a Nos 2 a:t oI2a25 in/ond C^p.No-17252 ol2025

ln view of the above, l.A,Nos.2 & 3 of^{2025 are allowed.} Consequently, the Criminal Petition is^{allowed and the proceedings} in C.C.No.13957 of 2021,^pending on^{the file of the learned XIV} Additional Chief Metropolitan^{Magistrate at Hyderabad, are hereby} quashed subject to the petitioners^paying an amount of^Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the^{Director, TelanganaSainik} Welfare, Hyderabad, and Rs.5,000/-^{(Rupees Five Thousand Only)} to the High Court Legal^{Services Committee for the State of} Telangana, within a^period of^{two (02) weeks from today and file} proof of the same before the Registry.

7 . Miscellaneous applications, if any^{pending, shallstand closed.}

SD/- N. CHANDRA^{SEKHAR RAO} DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 The XIV Additional^{Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,at} Hyderabad 2 The Station House^{Officer,Pan.iagutta Police Station, Hyderabad District'} 3 Two CCs to the^{Public Prosecutor, High Courtfor the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

4 One CC to Sri^{P. Vamsheedhar Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC]

4 't(

One CC to Sri Syed Asham, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copres 6,

(Along with a Copy of Joint lt/emo of Compromise)

Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001⁽ Rupees Ten thousand^{c r} y ) has been paid by Sri P. Vamsheedhar Reddy, Counsel for the Petition. as directed by thc Hon'ble Court vide order dated 09-0'l-2026 as^Rs; ,,0001 (Rupees Ftvr-' thousand only) to the^"Director, Telangana Sainik^Wr: are. Hyderabad, and Rs 5,0001 (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Higl' )ou rt Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, and^filecl rlemo as proof of compliance USR No 8145 of 2026 dated 23-01-2026.

Kam/PSL

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED: 09/01 12026

COMMON ORDER

l.A.Nos.2&3of2025 ln/and CRLP No.17252 of 2025

::'j"=15'
;.riTAfEl.
(o
?- , . !l
:r. l
$rtts rstt
oo

BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED

<br>