Dismissed¶44

Smt. v. Padmavathi v The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Feb 2026CRLP/1721/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 Cr.P.C.; quashing of criminal proceedings; C.C. No. 4745 of 2021; Special (Mobile) PCR Act Magistrate, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy; Accused Nos. 1 to 3; de facto complainant Smt. Voruganti Sowjanya; compromise/settlement between parties dated 24.03.2025; criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed; Telangana High Court at Hyderabad; Tirumala Devi Eada, J.; Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous following the parties' compromise of 24.03.2025, and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stood closed. ¶44

Smt. v. Padmavathi Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

I i g I i l 1 I I I

¶2

[34441

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 172 1oF 2023

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

1 Smt. V. Padmavathi Wo V. Srinivas Aged about 4g years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Flat No.504, Sri Lakshmi. Enclave, Road l.to.a, S"Ogrru Nagar, Beside Reliance Trends, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad

¶9

2 Smt. Voruganti Divya Wo. Laxman, Agedabout 33 years, Caste: OC_Vysya, R/o. Ftat No.^.t06, Vijaya Vihar, RoaO io. Z, Creen fiiil, Cotony, Saroornagar of Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

3 Sri. Guduguntla Laxman Slg, late Ventesharulu, Aged about 34 years, Caste: OC-Vysya, R/o. Ftat No. 303, Sri Lakshmi nmUiia-nesiOency, Krshnaveni Nagar, Saroornagar of Ranga Reddy Diskict.

¶11

Petitioners No.'l to 3 represented by their GpA holder Mr. parasar Venkata Subbu Kamal Swaroop Sarvepalti S/o Sr*.p"f f i Venkata Subbu sundareshwar, aged about 38 years, o"c, o"ntisi n[ H.No.27_2_277, Lucky Board Cenke, Eswar Dental Hospital, Aatajinag;r, lle ore, Stonehousepet,

¶12

Petitioners 1 to 3 are represented by GpA Holder Mr. Sarvelpalli Venkata Subbu Kamal Swaroop Sarvepalli as per Court Ordet dt.2}ll2t23.

¶13

AND

¶14

...petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 3.

¶15

1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by the public prosecutor, High Court at

¶16

Hyderabad

¶17

smt, oraganti Sowjanya wo Aravind, Aged about 26 years, occ: Housewife, R/o Flat No.402, H. No.16-1 1_20l1/A/8,^-Sreepuram ' Colony, Moosarambagh,,

¶18

Malakpet, Hyderabad

¶19

...RespondenUDe_facto Complainant

¶20

Petition under section 4g2 0t cr.p c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar puiitiJn, the High court may be preased to Quash-the proceedings against the petitioners/Accused No 1 to 3 in c.c. No.4745 of 2021 on the fire of fl-Judiciar Magistrate ot rirst ctass-speciar (Mobire) pcR Act, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy-cum-rV Addr. Metroportan in the interest of tvtagrstrate-ium-rv jristice. Addr Junior civir Judgei

¶21

l.A. NO: 2OF 2023

¶22

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the ctr iumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal.Petition, the High^Cot rt may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitirr rers/Accused No.1 to 3 in C.C. No. 4745 of 2021 on the file of lll-Judicial Magistrak, >f First Class-Special (Mobile) PCR Act, Ranga Reddy-Cum-lV Addl. Metropolttr r Magistrate-Cum-lV Addl. Junior Civil Judge L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy,^pendingt isposal of the above Criminal Petition.

¶23

l.A. NO: 5 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the crr ttmstances stated^an the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High C(,r^{rt may be pleasedto} pass order of substitute service in any Telugu Daily Nerr;paper at Malakpet, Hyderabad for Respondent. No.2, in the interest of^justice.

¶25

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Merr crandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of^rl i M A K Mukheed, Advocate for the Petitioners and The Public Prosecutor on beh^rlf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAN GANA AT HYDERABAD

¶28

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶29

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1721 of 2023

¶30

Dale:04.02.2026

¶31

Between:

¶32

Smt. V.Padmavathi and two others

¶33

...Petitioners

¶34

AND

¶35

The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,

¶36

High Court at Hyderabad and another

¶37

...Respondents

¶38

ORDER

¶39

When the matter is taken up, learned Additional Public

¶40

Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that during the pendency

¶41

of this criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter on 24.03.2025, and hence, this petition has become

¶42

infructuous.

¶43

ln view of the above submission, this Criminal Petition is

¶44

dismissed as infructuous.

¶45

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶46

closed.

¶47

Sd/. P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶48

//TRUE COPYII

¶49

SECTION OFFICER

¶50

To, '1 . The lll-Judicial Magistrate of First Class-Special⁽ bile) PCR Act, Ranga Reddy.Cum-lVAdditionalMetropolitanMagistrate-Cum-lVAdditionalJunior Civil Judge L.B.Nagar,^RangaReddy.

¶51