Disposed¶41

Bijjala Narsaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Feb 2026CRLP/1183/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court (J. Sreenivas Rao, 03.02.2026), Crl.P. No. 1183 of 2026, Bijjala Narsaiah v. State of Telangana & B. Sucharitha: appearance of 65-year-old accused dispensed with in C.C. No. 102 of 2021, Shadnagar, on age/health grounds; counsel to represent on all dates; no ruling on quashing or merits.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of the petitioner/accused in C.C. No. 102 of 2021 dispensed with, subject to representation through counsel on every hearing date; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed. ¶41

Bijjala Narsaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

[³³⁰³¹

i i ! ii I I I I

I I i i I t t

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶5

TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1183 OF 2026

¶9

. Between:

¶10

Bijjala Narsaiah, S/o Chandraiah Aged :65 years, occ: Business, R/o H.No. 3216712, GK Colony, Hyderguda, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District, Telangana State. ...Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt B Sucharitha,, Wo BVR Mohan Reddy, aged'.72^years, Occ :Business R/o H.No. 1020, Road No.46, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad-500034, Telangana State ...Respondents/ Defacto Complainant

¶14

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^may be pleased toto quash the proceedings in C.C. No.102 of 2021 on the file^of the Honourable Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate, Shadnagar against the Petitioner,

¶15

l.A. NO: 2OF 2026

¶16

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court^may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioner in C.C. No. 1O2 ot 2021 on the file of the Honble Principal Judicial First^Class Magistrate, Shadriagar in the interest of^justice

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum^of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of^{Ms. Asra} Fatima, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri M. Ramachandra^{Reddy the} Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent^No.1

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

INTIIE HIGII COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1183 ot2026

Da!e: 03.02.2026

Between;

Bijjala N.arsaiah

...Petitioner

AND

The Stat: of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangarn at Hyderabad and another

¶29

...Respondents

¶30

ORDER

¶31

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to quaslr the proceedings in C.C.No.l0Z of 20Zl on the file of the learned l)rincipal Judicial First Class Magistrate, Shadnagar.

¶32

Heard Ms.Asra Fatima, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Rrmachandra Reddy, teamea eAdtional public prosecutor for respondt:nt No.l.

¶33

, I

¶34

Though the Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.l02 of 2021, the learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his prayer and requested tiri. Cou.t to disperse with the appearance of the petitioner/accused in C.C. No.l02 of 2021 on

¶35

\ i

¶36

¶37

the frle of the learned Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate, shadnagar, on the ground that the petitioner is 65 years otd and is suffering from age-related ailments.

¶38

The leamed Additional Public Prosecutor has not opposed the

¶39

submissions made by the learned counsel for petitioner.

¶40

[n view of the above submissions, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the presence of the petitioner/accused in C-C. No.l02 of 2021on the file of the learned Principal Judicial First class Magistate, Shadnagar, is dispensed with, subject to the condition that he shall be represented through his counsel on each and every date of hearing. If the presence of the petitioner is required, he shall appear before the trial Court. In case of his non-appearance on the specif,rc date fixed by the trial Court for his appearance, the trial Court is entitled to proceed with the matter, in accordance with [aw.

¶41