M/s. Venkata Sai Engineering, v. M/s.Vaidhatru Pharma Pvt. Ltd.

Telangana HC4 Feb 2026CP/294/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A creditor filed a winding-up petition against M/s. Vaidhatru Pharma Pvt. Ltd. under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner submitted that the dispute had been settled. The Court recorded this fact and ordered the closure of the Company Petition without further adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The Company Petition No. 294 of 2015 was closed on the submission of settlement by the petitioner.

M/s. Venkata Sai Engineering, Vs M/s.Vaidhatru Pharma Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

[^321sj

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

¶6

COMPANY PETITION NO: 294 OF 2015

¶7

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956

¶8

AND

¶9

lN THE MATTER OF M/s. VAIDHATRU PHARMA pVT. LTD

¶10

Between:

¶11

[//s. Venkata Sai Engineenng, represented by its proprietor Sri K. Venkateswara !-ao,^{S/o Late K. Chalapathi Rao, having its Office at ptot No.494,495, 503 &} !0a^{Sy No '169, DhoolapallyRoad, Phase-V, (Extn.) LD A Jeedimetta,} Hyderabad - 14

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

lril/s. Vaidhatru Pharma Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under Companies Act 1956, Represented by its Managing Director, Registered office at Sai Heavens, Flat No 403, HIG- 532. 533, KPHB Vl Phase, Hyderabad -tZ AND

¶15

Factory situated at Sy NO.106, Plot NO.2B, Chick Sugar, Raichur Growth Centre, lndustrial Area, Raichur, Karnataka-5841 34

¶16

...RESPONDENT

¶17

Company Petition by Creditor for winding up under Sections 33(e) (fl, 3 (1) (a) & 439(1) (b), (c) of the Companies Act, 1956 Read wirh Rute 95 of the Company Court Rules 1959, praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to

¶18

a Wind up the respondent company namely tVl/s. Vaidhatru pharma pvt. Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act 1956, with its registered office at Sai Heaven's, Flat No. 403, HtG- 532, 533, KPHB Vt phase, I Hyderabad -72 under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956

¶19

b. Appoint an official liquidator attached to this court as r provrsronal lrquidator of the respondent company with all its powers unC: Section 457 of llte Companies Act, 1 956,

¶20

c to award costs of thrs petition,

¶21

d to grant such other rerief or reriefs to which the pe rloner is entitred and deemed frt by thrs Court

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶23

Petition under Section 148 read with 15'1 CpC p raying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the pe ition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 30.10.20.i for publication of advertisement in the local edition of Business Standard rnd Andhra Bhoomi telugu.

¶24

t.A NO: 2 OF 2015{COMPA. NO: 1584 0F 2015)

¶25

Petition under Section 450 of the Companies Act., 19{,r Read with Rule g of the company (court) Rules,^'1g59 prayrng that in the circur r tances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may h: preased to appoint an official liquidator attached to this court as a provisi,> rar Iiquidator of the respondent company with aI its powers under section 450,> the companies Act. 1956

¶26

This Company Petition comtng on for orders, upon ftlading the Judge,s summons and the affidavit dated 22 09 2015 frred by Sri. K. \i nkateswara Rao, the proprietor of the Petitioner company in support of the compe ry petition and upon hearing the arguments sri. N Manohar, Advocate for pe:r ioner and sri. S v Ramana, Advocate for Respondent.

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATB OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶29

THB HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DE,VI

¶30

COMPANY PETITION No.294 of 201s

¶31

DATE: 04.02.2026

¶32

Iletween:

¶33

M/s. Venkata Sai Engineering, ltepresented by its proprietor.

¶34

...Petitioner

¶35

AND

¶36

M/s.Vaidhatru Pharma Pvt. t.td.

¶37

. . Respondent

¶38

ORDER

¶39

This Company Petition is fited under Section a33 (e) (D, 434 (l) (a) and 439 (1) (b), (clof the Companies Act, 1956, read with Rule 95 of the Company Couft Rules 1959, seeking winding up of the

¶40

|espondent-company ancl fbr settlement of the dues of the petitioner.

¶41

Learned counsel fbr the petitioner submitted that the matter has

¶42

been settled and no orders are necessary in this Company Petition.

¶43

Accordingly, the Oompany Petition is closed

¶44

SD/- A.V.S.S.C.S.M.SARMA JOINT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad- Office at 1't floor corporate Bhawan, Nagole, Bandlaguda Thattiannaram Vil{age Hayathnagar lr4andal, Ranga Reddy District Telangana State Pin Code 500 680

¶49

The Official Liquidator, IV/s. Vaidhartu Pharma Pvt. Ltd (in Liqn) Office at 1st floor, Corporate Bhawan, Bandlaquda, Naqole, Hyderabad.

¶50

3 The Reqistrar^{of Companiestvlinistry. of CorporateA I rtrs' Governmentof} r ca. I hattiannarama

¶51

" r'nalr,'Iyj" rtoi c"ip5[i" snrwan.' Nagote. ^Bandlar Vitl;;": Hryrt-r,nrgi,'^{M;;;,i"il;s:nettv District- elansana state Pin} Code-500068

¶52

4 I he Reqional^{Dtrector,South Eastern Rggion'1y1'n151'1 rf Corporate .Affaits} " ilj'iri""Y,"'i"d;;;i;-dhr;n' r'r'g;r" B5ndlasuda ir ettiannaram^Villagg il"vli"nirglt- fulnarr^{nlnl' ReE;yDrstrrct "Telans:ra State Pin Code} 500068

¶53

o;;ab to^{Sri N lVlanohar' Advocatetol-qcl,}

¶54

o;; Cc^{io Sri S V Ramana, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶55

Two CD CoPies

pr/l'S

)

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0410212026

ORDER

+
li E S I,i
to B
()o
1 i'r r\q 2l/F
c)
I
*
t
Or
l: . ,-f ?tr

¶64

CP.No.294 of 2015

¶65

CLOSING THE CP

¶66

2/,.

M/s. Venkata Sai Engineering, v. M/s.Vaidhatru Pharma Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Venkata Sai Engineering, v. M/s.Vaidhatru Pharma Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Cerestra Advisors Private Limited Vs Lighthouse Canton Pte. Limited and 10 others

M. Srikanth, Vs Union of India

P. Ramabrahmam Vs State of Telangana

M/s Landt Fincorp Limited, Vs M/s Vmc Systems Limited

M/s. Economic Law Practice, Vs M/s.Vmc Systems Ltd.

Sojitz Corporation, Vs M/s Vmc Systems Limited