Sojitz Corporation, v. M/s Vmc Systems Limited
Company Petition – winding up under Companies Act, 1956
Case brief
What is this about?
Effect of NCLT dissolution on pending winding-up petitions; closure of company petitions as infructuous. Eight creditors' winding-up petitions against M/s VMC Systems Limited (registered office Greenlands, Begumpet, Hyderabad) — C.P.Nos.41, 215, 271 of 2014; 45 & 115 of 2015; 135, 150 & 157 of 2016 — under Sections 433(e), 433(f), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 with Rules 9, 95, 177 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and Section 151 CPC interim applications, were closed by common order dated 04.02.2026 of Justice T. Madhavi Devi (High Court for the State of Telangana) because the company had already been dissolved by the NCLT, Hyderabad, by order dated 20.02.2024 in I.A. (IBC) No.528/2022 & Cont.A. (IBC) No.31/2023 in C.P. (IB) No.677/7/HDB/2018. Petitioners (Micro Plastics, Wealthtree Advisors, Sojitz Corporation, Economic Law Practice, Suravarapu, L&T Infrastructure Finance, AMAX Technologies, L&T Fincorp) free to pursue alternative remedies. Claimed debt figure in C.P.41/2014: Rs. 62,56,233/- approximately. Relevant for: infructuous winding-up petitions post company dissolution, Companies Act 1956 Sections 433/434/439, liberty to avail alternative remedy, IBC cross-reference.