Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

A. Anjaiah Vs Padmavathamma — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Telangana HC
2026
A. Anjaiah Vs PadmavathammaA. Anjaiah v. Padmavathamma

Dismissed¶30

A. Anjaiah v. Padmavathamma

Telangana HC10 Feb 2026AS/166/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Appeal Suit AS.No.166 of 2019, decided 10-02-2026 by Justice Renuka Yara; appeal under S.96 r/w O.41 R.1 CPC against Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 in O.S. No. 76 of 2014 (Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar). Appellants/plaintiffs: A. Anjaiah (advocate & social worker, Shadnagar) and Ramachandraiah (driver & social worker, Shadnagar, Mahaboob Nagar Dist.). Respondents/defendants: Smt. Padmavathamma (deceased, per L.Rs. 7-13), Smt. Saraswathamma, Smt. Susheelamma, Dr. D. Vijaya Laxmi (Vijaya Hospital, Shadnagar), The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Endowments, The State of Telangana (District Collector, Mahaboobnagar), and K. Shanmukha Chary, K. Srinivas, K. Prabhakar, K. Sudhakar, K. Jayaprakash, K. Chandramouli, K. Murali (Shadnagar). Counsel: Sri K. Ramachandra (appellants); Sri K. Ctraitanya (Resp. 2-4, 7-12); GP FOR APPEALS (Resp. 5 & 6). Outcome: appeal dismissed, no order as to costs. Source is a decree/notice copy only; no judicial reasoning reproduced.

What did the court decide?

None to the appellants; the Appeal Suit is dismissed and there is no order as to costs. ¶30

Why is it important?

The appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 in O.S.No.76 of 2014 (styled in the operative order as the 'Family Court Appeal') is dismissed; the decision of the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar accordingly stands. ¶30

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None to the appellants; the Appeal Suit is dismissed and there is no order as to costs.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 passed in O.S.No.76 of 2014 by the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar, against which this Appeal Suit was filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 CPC, should be set aside.

Court's answer

The appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 in O.S.No.76 of 2014 (styled in the operative order as the 'Family Court Appeal') is dismissed; the decision of the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar accordingly stands.

Ratio / Principle

There shall be no order as to costs in the appeal.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Appeal Suit No. 166 of 2019, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Hon'ble Smt. Justice Renuka Yara), decided 10-02-2026. Appeal under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 passed in O.S. No. 76 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar, preferred by plaintiffs A. Anjaiah (advocate/social worker) and Ramachandraiah against thirteen defendants including the Assistant Commissioner, Department of Endowments, the State of Telangana (Rep. by District Collector, Mahaboobnagar), and Respondents 7-13 (sons of Late Veerabrahmachary); Respondent 1 Smt. Padmavathamma noted as died per L.Rs. 7-13. DECREE COPY ONLY: the appeal is dismissed and there is no order as to costs. No reasoned judgment body, statutory analysis, or precedent treatment is contained in the supplied text.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRIJARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

APPEAL SUIT : 166 0F 2019

Between:

A. Anjaiah, S/o Late Nagaiah, Age: 56^years, Occ: Advocate^{and Social} Worker, R/o H. No.^'13-27813, Bhagyanagar Colony,^Shadnagar.

- Ramachandraiah, S/o Pedda Narsaiah, Age.^{38 years, Occ:DriverandSocial} Worker R/o H. No. 9-86, Raghavendra Colony, Shadnagar,^{Mahaboob Nagar} District.

...Appellants/Pla i ntiffs

AND

Smt. Padmavathamma^(Died per L.R.No.7 to¹³⁾

Smt. Saraswathamma, Wo. Late^{ManibushanaChary,Age: 73 years,}

Smt. Susheelamma, Wo. Late Umapathi,^{Age: 70 years, Occ: Household,} Both are R/o C/o Kammadanam Sudhakar, Sai^{Home Needs and Steel} P.alace, Near Police Station, Shadnagar

Dr. D. Vijaya Laxmi, Wo V. Chandulal, Age. 38^{years,Occ: Proprietor,M/s.} Vijaya'Hospital, D. No. 19-23, Thirumala Colony,^Shadnagar

The Assistant Commissioner, Department^{of Endowments,Near Bhagat} Singh Statue, Rajendra Nagar, Mahaboobnagar

The State of Telangana, Rep. by the^{District Collector, Mahaboobnagar}

K. Shanmukha Chary, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary,^{Age: 68 years,}

K. Srinivas, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary,^{Age: 67 years,}

K. Prabhakar, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary,^{Age: 66 years,}

K. Sudhakar, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary,^{Age: 65 years,}

K. Jayaprakash, S/o. Late^{Veerabrahmachary,Age: 62 years,}

12.K. Chandramouli, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary,^{Age:60 years,}

K. Murali, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary, Age.58^years,

Respondents 7 to 13 are R/o C/o^{Kammadanam Sudhakar,Sai Home Needs} and Steel Palace, Near Police Station, Shadnagat

... Res po n dents/Defenda nts

Appeal under Section 96 R/w order 41 Rule¹ of^{C.P.C. againstthe Judgment} and Decree dated 29-10-2018^{passed in O.S.No.76of 2014on the file of the Court} of the Principal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar.

This appeal coming on for hearing and^{uponperusing the Memorandum of} Appeal, the orders of the Lower Court^{and the material papersin the case, and}

upon hearinl; the arguments of Sri K. Ramachandra, Advocate for the Appellant and Sri K. Ctraitanya, Advocate forthe Respondents No.2 to 4,7 to 12and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondents No.S & 6.

This Court doth order and decree as follows:

That the Family Court Appeal be and hereby is dismissed; and

That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/- N.SRIHARI DEPUTY REGIS

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

To,

fhe Prinr;ipal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar 2. Two CD 3opies Karn/PSL

N/

.. :j4il*6ii-:1#-J

F -

I It. II

HIGH COURT

DATED i'1010212026

DECREE

AS.No.166 of 2019

DISMISSING THE APPEAL :SUIT

)e
rE

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 passed in O.S.No.76 of 2014 by the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar, against which this Appeal Suit was filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 CPC, should be set aside.medium confidence¶26
The court held
The appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 in O.S.No.76 of 2014 (styled in the operative order as the 'Family Court Appeal') is dismissed; the decision of the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar accordingly stands.ratio¶30

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

C.P.C. (Code of Civil Procedure)Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1¶26

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 passed in O.S.No.76 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar (decision under challenge in this Appeal Suit).¶26
Court of the Principal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar · 29-10-2018
Prior proceeding
O.S.No.76 of 2014 was pending/proceeding on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar, and ended in the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 now under appeal.¶26

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
A. Anjaiah, S/o Late Nagaiah¶7
Sri K. Ramachandra
appellant
Ramachandraiah, S/o Pedda Narsaiah¶8
Sri K. Ramachandra
respondent
Smt. Padmavathamma (Died per L.R. No. 7 to 13)¶11
respondent
Smt. Saraswathamma, Wo. Late Manibushana Chary¶12
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
Smt. Susheelamma, Wo. Late Umapathi¶13
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
Dr. D. Vijaya Laxmi, Wo V. Chandulal¶14
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Endowments¶15
GP FOR APPEALS
respondent
The State of Telangana, Rep. by the District Collector, Mahaboobnagar¶16
GP FOR APPEALS
respondent
K. Shanmukha Chary, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary¶17
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
K. Srinivas, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary¶18
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
K. Prabhakar, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary¶19
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
K. Sudhakar, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary¶20
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
K. Jayaprakash, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary¶21
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
K. Chandramouli, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary¶22
Sri K. Ctraitanya
respondent
K. Murali, S/o. Late Veerabrahmachary¶23

Coram

AI extract

Renuka Yaraauthor¶4

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 10 Feb 2026 · February
Registered: 29 Mar 2019
Case no.: AS/166/2019
CNR: HBHC010954292018
Bench: Renuka Yara
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: Appeal Suit

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Renuka Yara

Ajay Kumar Bobbala Vs The State of Telangana
9 Feb 2026
Smt. Masarath Fatima Vs Telangana state Southern power distribution corporation limited
9 Feb 2026
Aleti Anirudh Babu Vs Aleti Raja Venkata Jaya Simha Reddy
6 Feb 2026
Chintala Jyothi Vs Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd.
10 Feb 2026
Valladas Raghavulu Vs The State of Telangana
11 Feb 2026
H. Sajida Banu Vs The State of Telangana
11 Feb 2026

Cite this judgement

A. Anjaiah v. Padmavathamma, AS/166/2019 (TEL), decided on 10 February 2026.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

C.P.C. (Code of Civil Procedure)Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1

View all statutes

Procedural history2

Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 passed in O.S.No.76 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar (decision under challenge in this Appeal Suit).Court of the Principal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar · 29-10-2018
O.S.No.76 of 2014 was pending/proceeding on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, at Mahabubnagar, and ended in the Judgment and Decree dated 29-10-2018 now under appeal.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Renuka Yara

Parties & counsel