Dismissed¶32

K.Sudarshan Reddy, v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Jul 2025WP/9715/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Telangana High Court at Hyderabad; Justice K. Sarath; order dated 16-07-2025; W.P. No. 9715 of 2017; writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Tahsildar Balapur Mandal; Ac.29.30 Gts in Sy.Nos.85 and 86, Balapur Village and Mandal, R.R. District; Mantri Mahesh Mudiraj; Section 151 CPC; I.A. No.1 of 2017 (WPMP No.12039 of 2017); liberty to approach competent authority; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority if any grievance survives; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed. ¶32

K.Sudarshan Reddy, Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶32

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of respondent No.2 (Tahsildar, Balapur Mandal) in entertaining the representations of respondent No.4 and others and sending subordinates to the petitioners' property to the extent of Ac.29.30 Gts in Sy.Nos.85 and 86, Balapur Village and Mandal, R.R. District, thereby interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment, is illegal and arbitrary. (Framed from the prayer; not adjudicated, as the petition was withdrawn.)

¶19

Ratio / Principle

Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, making an endorsement to that effect on the Court bundle; permission was granted and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority if any grievance survives.

¶32

Key takeaways

There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶32
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.ratio¶33

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Telangana High Court (K. Sarath, J.), W.P. No. 9715 of 2017, order dated 16-07-2025: Writ of mandamus sought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by K. Sudarshan Reddy and two others against the Tahsildar, Balapur Mandal, challenging the entertainment of representations by the 4th respondent (Mantri Mahesh Mudiraj) and the resultant sending of subordinates to the petitioners' property admeasuring Ac.29.30 Gts in Sy.Nos.85 and 86, Balapur Village and Mandal, R.R. District, interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment; interim direction sought in I.A. No.1 of 2017 (WPMP No.12039 of 2017) under Section 151 CPC. At hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw with an endorsement on the Court bundle. Held: permission granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the competent authority if any grievance survives; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE K.SARATH

¶7

WRlT PETITION NO: 9715 OF 2017

¶8

Between:

¶9

K.sudarshan Reddy, S/o.^{K.Malla Reddy, Aged about 62 years, Occ} Agriculture, Fl/o .H.No . 1-182, Balapur,^{R. R. D istrict.}

¶10

K.sanjeeva Reddy, S/o.K.Malla^{Reddy,Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture,} PJo H.No .9-1 10, Balapur, R:R.District.

¶11

K.Prakash Reddy, S/o.K.Malla^{Reddy, Aged about 58 years, OccAgriculture,} Wo.H.No.9-12414, Balapur, R.R.District, ...pETlTtONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

-1 . State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary - Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Tahsildar, Balapur^[\rlandal.

¶15

The Station House Officer, Balapur^{P.S., R.R. District.}

¶16

Mantri [\4ahesh tVludiraj, S/o.^Not Known,^{AgeMajor,Occ Not Known,} 'Fl/o.

¶17

Nadargul Village, Balapur^{[trlandal R.R.} District.

¶18

...RES'ONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution^{of lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a Writ or order more^{particularlyin the nature of writ of} lr,4andamus, or any other appropriate writ, order^{or direction, declaringthe actionof} the 2nd Respondent in entertaining^{the representations from the 4th respondent} and others and thereby sending his^{subordinatesto the petitioners propertyto the} extent of Ac.29.30Gts in Sy.No.85 and 86,^{Balapur Village and Mandal,} R.R_District and interfering with^{peaceful possession and enjoyment over the said} property as illegal, arbitrary.

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 12039 O^{F 20171}

¶21

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^{prayingthatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High Courtmay be pleasedto grant}

¶22

-.4i.:..1;€ :iit:-1r9{{;',

¶23

interim direction crirecting the Respondent 2 not to inter.ere with the peacefur possession and enjoyment of the petitioner to an exten: of Ac.2g-30 Gts., in Sy.Nos.85 & 86, Balapur Village and lrrlandal, R.R.District.

¶24

Counsel for the petitioners: SRI C.RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Gp FOR REVENUI: Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Gp FOR HOM;uounset for the Respondent No.4:

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

¶27

¶28

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTTCEK.SARATH}

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.9715^{of 2OL7}

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

Learned Colrnsel appearing^{for the petitioncrs seeking} permission to withdraw the^{writ petition and made an} endorsement to that effect^{on the Court bundle'}

¶32

Accordingly, pcrmission^{is granted as sought for and} the writ petition is^{dismissedas withdrawn by gralting} liberty to the petitioner^{to approach competentauthority, if} any grievance survives.^{There shall be no order as to costs'}

¶33

3 Miscellaneous^{petitions, ifany, pending in this Writ} Petition shall stand^closed.

¶34

SD/. K.^AMMAJI TY REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY'

¶35

CTION^OFFICER

¶36

¶37